WORLD OF ATTITUDES IN RESEARCH ARTICLE DISCUSSION SECTIONS: A CROSS-LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JALILIFAR A.R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Technology of Education Journal Year:2011 | Volume:5 | Issue:3 Page(s): 177-186

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,099

Download:

399

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

WORLD OF ATTITUDES IN RESEARCH ARTICLE DISCUSSION SECTIONS: A CROSS-LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

JALILIFAR A.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HEDGEQ2

BOOSTERQ3

PERSIANQ3

ENGLISHQ2

PSYCHIATRYQ2

ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHINGQ2

Abstract

This study aimed to account for metadiscourse variations in the discussion sections of articles written in PERSIAN and ENGLISH and published in Iranian as well as international scholarly journals in ENGLISH Language Teaching and PSYCHIATRY. For this purpose, 90 research article discussions were selected, and then HEDGEs and BOOSTERs were identified based on the taxonomies of metadiscourse markers. The results of the quantitative and qualitative analyses revealed significant differences in frequency, type, and functions of these devices in the texts. These differences might be attributed to lack of awareness of the conventional rules of ENGLISH rhetoric, limited and fragile knowledge of academic ENGLISH by PERSIAN writers, and lack of explicit instruction and exposure to pragmatic and sociolinguistic rules of ENGLISH by PERSIAN researchers. Further research in other disciplines will help to make more accurate generalizations about the role of metadiscourse markers in research articles.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JALILIFAR, A.R.. (2011). WORLD OF ATTITUDES IN RESEARCH ARTICLE DISCUSSION SECTIONS: A CROSS-LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY OF EDUCATION (JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATION), 5(3), 177-186. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/155356/en

Vancouver: Copy

JALILIFAR A.R.. WORLD OF ATTITUDES IN RESEARCH ARTICLE DISCUSSION SECTIONS: A CROSS-LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY OF EDUCATION (JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATION)[Internet]. 2011;5(3):177-186. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/155356/en

IEEE: Copy

A.R. JALILIFAR, “WORLD OF ATTITUDES IN RESEARCH ARTICLE DISCUSSION SECTIONS: A CROSS-LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE,” JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY OF EDUCATION (JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATION), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 177–186, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/155356/en

Related Journal Papers