COMPARISON OF WEAP AND MIKE BASIN MODELS IN WATER RESOURCES ALLOCATION (CASE STUDY: TLAVAR RIVER)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BAGHERI HAROONI M.H.; MORID S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Water and Soil Conservation Year:2013 | Volume:20 | Issue:1 Page(s): 151-167

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,697

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF WEAP AND MIKE BASIN MODELS IN WATER RESOURCES ALLOCATION (CASE STUDY: TLAVAR RIVER)

Author(s)

BAGHERI HAROONI M.H. | MORID S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

WATER ALLOCATIONQ1

MIKE BASINQ2

WEAPQ1

RELIABILITY INDEXQ2

TALVAR RIVERQ2

Abstract

Water resources scarcity and increasing demand have led to unbalanced supply-demand in the watersheds and water systems. Therefore, planning for efficient allocation has been a matter of importance. To resolve WATER ALLOCATION problems, various models and tools have been developed. Selection of these models is also another issue that needs to be done by an holistic approach. WEAP and MIKE BASIN are two of the well known models in this regard and comparison of their abilities construct objective of the present paper. To do this, capabilities and features of the two models were firstly outlined. Then in two assumptive examples, models were compared based on priority-base allocation and reservoir operation. Furthermore, models ran for a part of TALVAR RIVER as one of the main tributaries of the Ghezelozan River. This system consists of ten water demand nodes (domestic and agriculture) and three reservoirs. The results showed that in the priority-base allocation the performances were different, but they were identical in the operation rules and reservoir simulation. The results of RELIABILITY INDEX showed that MIKE BASIN simulation matched better with reality due to their ability to extract more water. While, WEAP showed better results for optimization and even distribution of deficits among nodes.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BAGHERI HAROONI, M.H., & MORID, S.. (2013). COMPARISON OF WEAP AND MIKE BASIN MODELS IN WATER RESOURCES ALLOCATION (CASE STUDY: TLAVAR RIVER). JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL CONSERVATION (JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES), 20(1), 151-167. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/156041/en

Vancouver: Copy

BAGHERI HAROONI M.H., MORID S.. COMPARISON OF WEAP AND MIKE BASIN MODELS IN WATER RESOURCES ALLOCATION (CASE STUDY: TLAVAR RIVER). JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL CONSERVATION (JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES)[Internet]. 2013;20(1):151-167. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/156041/en

IEEE: Copy

M.H. BAGHERI HAROONI, and S. MORID, “COMPARISON OF WEAP AND MIKE BASIN MODELS IN WATER RESOURCES ALLOCATION (CASE STUDY: TLAVAR RIVER),” JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL CONSERVATION (JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES), vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 151–167, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/156041/en

Related Journal Papers