NOËL CARROLL’S VIEW ON MEANING AND THE MENTALITY OF ARTIST

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHAMS MEHDI; MESHKAT MOHAMMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

671

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

NOËL CARROLL’S VIEW ON MEANING AND THE MENTALITY OF ARTIST

Author(s)

SHAMS MEHDI | MESHKAT MOHAMMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NOËL CARROLLQ1

IMPLICATIONQ2

SIGNIFICANCEQ2

MEANINGQ2

INTENTIONALISMQ1

MENTALISMQ3

Abstract

‘Modest actual INTENTIONALISM’ is a view held by NOËL CARROLL, who maintains that themeaning of an artwork is determined by the successfully realized intentions of its author. After calling himself modest actual intentionalist, for a long time, Carroll recently has chosen to change position and, now, he holds a view which he calls ‘modest actual MENTALISM’. Why he preferred to change his account and how is the latter position different from the former? He did not offer a clear account of the constitution of MEANING in his former period, but it seems that he accepts a framework which is based on M-intentions. I argue that this framework is not always suitable for the explanation of MEANING. Works of art have IMPLICATIONs that are not intended by their writers and I claim that some intentionalists, like Carroll, tend to cover such cases by regarding them as an aspect of the work’s SIGNIFICANCE, or, are inclined to link them with the unconscious intentions of the author. The former relate those IMPLICATIONs solely to the responses of audiences which, I argue, is counterintuitive, on some occasions; and the latter is not justified by a framework, based on M-intentions. I argue that because of these fundamental problems in INTENTIONALISM, Carroll, chose to shift to MENTALISM, which is more powerful and resilient with regard to some counterexamples.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHAMS, MEHDI, & MESHKAT, MOHAMMAD. (2018). NOEL CARROLL’S VIEW ON MEANING AND THE MENTALITY OF ARTIST. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, 10(1 (25) ), 93-106. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/157461/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHAMS MEHDI, MESHKAT MOHAMMAD. NOEL CARROLL’S VIEW ON MEANING AND THE MENTALITY OF ARTIST. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK[Internet]. 2018;10(1 (25) ):93-106. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/157461/en

IEEE: Copy

MEHDI SHAMS, and MOHAMMAD MESHKAT, “NOEL CARROLL’S VIEW ON MEANING AND THE MENTALITY OF ARTIST,” RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, vol. 10, no. 1 (25) , pp. 93–106, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/157461/en

Related Journal Papers