THE CRITIC OF FREE HARMONY OF FACULTIES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SALMANI ALI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK Year:2017 | Volume:53 | Issue:23 Page(s): 37-50

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

615

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE CRITIC OF FREE HARMONY OF FACULTIES

Author(s)

SALMANI ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KANTQ2

AESTHETICSQ1

GOODQ1

BEAUTYQ1

Abstract

The notion of free harmony of faculties is very important in KANT's aesthetic. KANT puts this notion for reply to this question how we can believe in universality in aesthetic judgment, if we perceive it subjectively. KANT claims that pleasure in aesthetic judgment arises from subjective statue which is called free play or harmony of faculties. Since KANT believes that only cognition is communicable, his efforts to bring in cognitive faculties in aesthetic evaluation, justifies universal validity of aesthetic judgment. KANT cannot clearly explain the notion of free harmony, then some his interpreters effort, by separating this judgment from any concept, and by considering natural and unconscious characteristic for the aesthetic experience, connect the area of cognition with aesthetic and by this justify universality of aesthetic judgment (Precognitive interpretation). Second, interpretation believes in interference conception in aesthetic evaluation. They make efforts to provide direct similarity between cognition and aesthetic. There is no valid document in supporting of tow interpretations. First, interpretation by believing to unconscious characteristic for aesthetic experience cannot depict the distinction between usual objects and aesthetic objects. Second, interpretation by believing to interference of indeterminate conception in aesthetic experience, not only cannot eliminate interest of universality but also generally neglect it.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SALMANI, ALI. (2017). THE CRITIC OF FREE HARMONY OF FACULTIES. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, 53(23 ), 37-50. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/157513/en

Vancouver: Copy

SALMANI ALI. THE CRITIC OF FREE HARMONY OF FACULTIES. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK[Internet]. 2017;53(23 ):37-50. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/157513/en

IEEE: Copy

ALI SALMANI, “THE CRITIC OF FREE HARMONY OF FACULTIES,” RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, vol. 53, no. 23 , pp. 37–50, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/157513/en

Related Journal Papers