مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

481
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Antitheory and Neopragmatism in Steven Knapp and Walter Benn Michaels’ Ideas

Pages

  91-126

Abstract

 Nowadays, one of the most fundamental and controversial theoretical discussions in literary criticism is to evade meta-theory in literaryAntitheory| Grand Theory| Practice| Steven Knapp| Walter Benn Michaelss. The prominent thinkers in this area, known as neo-pragmatists, include Terry Eagleton, Stanley Fish,Antitheory| Grand Theory| Practice| Steven Knapp| Walter Benn Michaels, andAntitheory| Grand Theory| Practice| Steven Knapp| Walter Benn Michaels who emphasize that the course of theory and criticism has now been diverted from its original aim of advancing social justice in the early eighteenth century and has now become a fetish that solidifies and reproduces the hierarchical society. In 1980s, we witnessed the acme of theoretical discussions andAntitheory| Grand Theory| Practice| Steven Knapp| Walter Benn Michaelss in literary studies; yet, in this decade, anti-theory and anti-theoretical discussions come to their acme, knowing Knapp and Michaels’ ideas as one of their key manifestos. Knapp and Michaels believe that theoretical discussions have been the result of the separation of such inseparable terms as meaning-intention, language-speech acts, and theory-practice, leading to “ theoretical enterprise. ” These two critics argue that since authorial discussions are “ empirical” issues, theoretical responses to them do not solve the problem; rather, they are merely a “ theoretical temptation. ” In this article, following a concise survey of thinkers in the realm of theory and related concepts, in particular anti-theory, meta-theory, and post-theory, we have attempted to explore the two’ s ideas, review reactions to them and the errors in their argument, and finally investigate what message Knapp and Michaels’ article can have for our country’ s literary society.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Javidshad, Mahdi, & NIKOUEI, ALIREZA. (2019). Antitheory and Neopragmatism in Steven Knapp and Walter Benn Michaels’ Ideas. LITERARY CRITICISM, 12(46 ), 91-126. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/158350/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Javidshad Mahdi, NIKOUEI ALIREZA. Antitheory and Neopragmatism in Steven Knapp and Walter Benn Michaels’ Ideas. LITERARY CRITICISM[Internet]. 2019;12(46 ):91-126. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/158350/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Mahdi Javidshad, and ALIREZA NIKOUEI, “Antitheory and Neopragmatism in Steven Knapp and Walter Benn Michaels’ Ideas,” LITERARY CRITICISM, vol. 12, no. 46 , pp. 91–126, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/158350/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button