COMPARISON BETWEEN RESULTS OF THE DIRECT EXTRACTION UTILITY FUNCTION AND ITS APPROXIMATE LINEAR ESTIMATES IN SOLVING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MODELS CASE STUDY: TYPE OF BUILDING STRUCTURES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSEINI Z.; KAZEMI M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Operational Research in its Applications Year:2016 | Volume:12 | Issue:4 (47) Page(s): 15-28

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,670

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON BETWEEN RESULTS OF THE DIRECT EXTRACTION UTILITY FUNCTION AND ITS APPROXIMATE LINEAR ESTIMATES IN SOLVING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MODELS CASE STUDY: TYPE OF BUILDING STRUCTURES

Author(s)

HOSEINI Z. | KAZEMI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING

MULTI ATTRIBUTE UTILITY FUNCTION

Abstract

Using the utility function is one of the oldest techniques for ranking alternatives in multiple attribute decision making problems. Due to the complexity in calculating the utility function, most studies have used linear approximations to estimate the single-attribute utility functions and weighted average them to integrate and achieve overall utility options. While the use of these forms is subject to acceptance of assumptions such as "Risk neutral" that are not consistent with the facts. Especially certain economic conditions such as boom or recession intensified this incompatibility. In this paper, a decision matrix rank options in order to achieve the appropriate structures in a construction project has been done. The utility function is calculated with the two approaches; using linear approximation and the direct extraction utility function of each option. The results showed significant differences between the ratings generated based on each approach.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

HOSEINI, Z., & KAZEMI, M.. (2016). COMPARISON BETWEEN RESULTS OF THE DIRECT EXTRACTION UTILITY FUNCTION AND ITS APPROXIMATE LINEAR ESTIMATES IN SOLVING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MODELS CASE STUDY: TYPE OF BUILDING STRUCTURES. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH AND ITS APPLICATIONS (JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS), 12(4 (47)), 15-28. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/164449/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOSEINI Z., KAZEMI M.. COMPARISON BETWEEN RESULTS OF THE DIRECT EXTRACTION UTILITY FUNCTION AND ITS APPROXIMATE LINEAR ESTIMATES IN SOLVING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MODELS CASE STUDY: TYPE OF BUILDING STRUCTURES. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH AND ITS APPLICATIONS (JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS)[Internet]. 2016;12(4 (47)):15-28. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/164449/en

IEEE: Copy

Z. HOSEINI, and M. KAZEMI, “COMPARISON BETWEEN RESULTS OF THE DIRECT EXTRACTION UTILITY FUNCTION AND ITS APPROXIMATE LINEAR ESTIMATES IN SOLVING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MODELS CASE STUDY: TYPE OF BUILDING STRUCTURES,” JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH AND ITS APPLICATIONS (JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS), vol. 12, no. 4 (47), pp. 15–28, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/164449/en

Related Journal Papers