SOME VIEWPOINTS ABOUT GHAZALI’S OPPOSITION WITH PHILOSOPHERS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHADEMI EYNOLLAH; NIKMORADI MOHAMMAD KAZEM

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: THEOLOGICAL- DOCTRIANAL RESEARCH (THE ISLAMIC SCIENCE QUARTERLY) Year:2011 | Volume:1 | Issue:3 Page(s): 77-101

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

884

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SOME VIEWPOINTS ABOUT GHAZALI’S OPPOSITION WITH PHILOSOPHERS

Author(s)

KHADEMI EYNOLLAH | NIKMORADI MOHAMMAD KAZEM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PHILOSOPHERSQ1

THEOLOGIANSQ2

WISDOMQ2

NARRATIONQ2

GHAZALIQ2

IBN SINAQ2

RELIGIONQ2

PHILOSOPHYQ2

THEOLOGYQ2

FREE WISDOMQ2

CONTROVERSY OF RELIGION AND WISDOMQ2

Abstract

It is clear that GHAZALI opposed PHILOSOPHERS. Considering the arguments of the intellectuals about the clarity of this opposition, the most popular explanation is the opposition of RELIGION with WISDOM, RELIGION with PHILOSOPHY, or THEOLOGY with PHILOSOPHY. Probably the reason for this interpretation is that GHAZALI regarded himself as the defendant of Islam, so he excommunicated PHILOSOPHERS. The final inference out of his books reveals that he, as one of the standard-bearers of Islam considered some PHILOSOPHERS’ ideas, particularly IBN SINA and Faraby as blasphemy, but it does not mean he believed WISDOM, thought and PHILOSOPHY were totally disbelief. His recognition, of course, as a single issue without extension can be true. While GHAZALI introduces IBN SINA and Farabi’s ideas as aspects of disbelief, there are doubts about the accuracy of this view, and the use of excommunication as the only solution to the problem. The discussion here is not for investigating the truth or falsity of these doubts, but preventing confused reasoning. The aim of this study is to clarify the issue that the opposition is mainly between a theological and a philosophical deduction of Islam.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KHADEMI, EYNOLLAH, & NIKMORADI, MOHAMMAD KAZEM. (2011). SOME VIEWPOINTS ABOUT GHAZALI’S OPPOSITION WITH PHILOSOPHERS. THEOLOGICAL- DOCTRIANAL RESEARCH (THE ISLAMIC SCIENCE QUARTERLY), 1(3), 77-101. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/167816/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHADEMI EYNOLLAH, NIKMORADI MOHAMMAD KAZEM. SOME VIEWPOINTS ABOUT GHAZALI’S OPPOSITION WITH PHILOSOPHERS. THEOLOGICAL- DOCTRIANAL RESEARCH (THE ISLAMIC SCIENCE QUARTERLY)[Internet]. 2011;1(3):77-101. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/167816/en

IEEE: Copy

EYNOLLAH KHADEMI, and MOHAMMAD KAZEM NIKMORADI, “SOME VIEWPOINTS ABOUT GHAZALI’S OPPOSITION WITH PHILOSOPHERS,” THEOLOGICAL- DOCTRIANAL RESEARCH (THE ISLAMIC SCIENCE QUARTERLY), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 77–101, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/167816/en

Related Journal Papers