CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF ENGINEERING AND HUMAN SCIENCES STUDENTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ANAJAFI FERESHTEH; ZERAAT ZAHRA; SOLTAN MOHAMMADI Z.; GHABCHIPOUR KOUSAR; KOHAN F.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES Year:2009 | Volume:2 | Issue:1 Page(s): 19-22

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,104

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF ENGINEERING AND HUMAN SCIENCES STUDENTS

Author(s)

Keywords

THINKINGQ2

CRITICAL THINKING SKILLSQ2

ENGINEERINGQ3

HUMAN SCIENCESQ3

Abstract

Aims. The extreme purpose of educational system, is training thinkful people and critical THINKING is one of the characterized way of THINKING. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the critical THINKING skills in ENGINEERING and HUMAN SCIENCES students of Shiraz University in 2008. Methods. This is a descriptive study performed by randomized sampling on 200 people of the goal society. The instrument of collecting data for this study was the form of California critical THINKING skills. The method of analyzing data included two descriptive and analytical parts and unidirectional variance analysis used. Results. The mean of evaluating was 22.88 in ENGINEERING and 20.13 in HUMAN SCIENCES group. The mean of analysis was 30.73 in ENGINEERING and 24.49 in HUMAN SCIENCES group and the mean of deduction was 25.71 in ENGINEERING and 21.39 in HUMAN SCIENCES group. Conclusion. Critical THINKING skills were low in both groups but higher in ENGINEERING group. In spite of differences, it is recommended to use templates and educational methods to improve these skills in educational courses.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ANAJAFI, FERESHTEH, ZERAAT, ZAHRA, SOLTAN MOHAMMADI, Z., GHABCHIPOUR, KOUSAR, & KOHAN, F.. (2009). CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF ENGINEERING AND HUMAN SCIENCES STUDENTS. EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES, 2(1), 19-22. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/174298/en

Vancouver: Copy

ANAJAFI FERESHTEH, ZERAAT ZAHRA, SOLTAN MOHAMMADI Z., GHABCHIPOUR KOUSAR, KOHAN F.. CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF ENGINEERING AND HUMAN SCIENCES STUDENTS. EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES[Internet]. 2009;2(1):19-22. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/174298/en

IEEE: Copy

FERESHTEH ANAJAFI, ZAHRA ZERAAT, Z. SOLTAN MOHAMMADI, KOUSAR GHABCHIPOUR, and F. KOHAN, “CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF ENGINEERING AND HUMAN SCIENCES STUDENTS,” EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–22, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/174298/en

Related Journal Papers