Automated Feedback vs. Human Feedback: A Study on AI-Driven Language Assessment

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Aliakbari Mohammad; Barzan Pooria; Sayyadi Mehran

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: AI and Tech in Behavioral and Social Sciences Year:2025 | Volume:3 | Issue:2 (پیاپی 10) Page(s): 113-126

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Automated Feedback vs. Human Feedback: A Study on AI-Driven Language Assessment

Author(s)

Aliakbari Mohammad | Barzan Pooria | Sayyadi Mehran | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Assessment

Feedback

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Human Feedback.

Abstract

This study examines the comparative effectiveness of automated Feedback from AI-driven language Assessment tools and traditional human Feedback in improving language learning outcomes. As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into educational technology, understanding its role in supporting language learners is critical. To address this, we conducted a 12-week controlled experiment with 80 EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners, dividing participants into two groups: one receiving Feedback from an AI-driven tool and the other from human instructors. Language proficiency improvements were assessed in grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation. Findings reveal that both Feedback methods significantly enhanced language skills. Human Feedback proved superior in fostering gains in pronunciation and contextual understanding, while AI-driven Feedback excelled in detecting and correcting grammatical errors. These results suggest that a hybrid model, blending AI and human Feedback, could provide the most effective support for language learners. This research enriches the literature on AI in education and offers practical insights for incorporating AI tools into language learning curricula.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans