THE IMPACT OF TASK TYPE AND GENDER ON TOTAL INCIDENCE OF NEGOTIATION FOR MEANING

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

TABATABAEI S.O.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: THE JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE PEDAGOGY AND PRACTICE Year:2009 | Volume:2 | Issue:4 Page(s): 238-270

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

772

Download:

220

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE IMPACT OF TASK TYPE AND GENDER ON TOTAL INCIDENCE OF NEGOTIATION FOR MEANING

Author(s)

TABATABAEI S.O. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NEGOTIATION FOR MEANINGQ3

FEEDBACKQ3

INTERACTIONQ2

TASKQ3

GENDERQ2

Abstract

The current study aims at investigating whether the GENDER of EFL learners and the kind of TASK utilized in TASK-based conversational INTERACTIONs influence the total incidence of one salient type of FEEDBACK, namely, NEGOTIATION FOR MEANING. Forty Iranian EFL students who were all English teaching majors completed the INTERACTIONal TASKs with both male and female interlocutors. Their language production in terms of the exchanged FEEDBACK was analyzed for the total incidence of NEGOTIATION FOR MEANING. The study investigated whether (1) the total incidence of NEGOTIATION FOR MEANING in FEEDBACK is different according to the group type (matched vs. mixed) and the kind of TASK utilized, (2) the FEEDBACK of males and females interacting in mixed-gender groups is different from each other in terms of NEGOTIATION FOR MEANING and the type of the assigned TASK, and (3) the incidence of NEGOTIATION FOR MEANING in FEEDBACK is different according to the interlocutors’ GENDER. The results of statistical analysis indicate that the incidence of NEGOTIATION FOR MEANING did not vary across the group types; thus the GENDER composition of the group did not seem to affect the amount of negotiation. The participants of both GENDERs generally tended to be engaged in more NEGOTIATION FOR MEANING in mixed-gender groups than in matched-gender groups, but this engagement was highly under the influence of TASK type.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

TABATABAEI, S.O.. (2009). THE IMPACT OF TASK TYPE AND GENDER ON TOTAL INCIDENCE OF NEGOTIATION FOR MEANING. THE JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE PEDAGOGY AND PRACTICE, 2(4), 238-270. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/181307/en

Vancouver: Copy

TABATABAEI S.O.. THE IMPACT OF TASK TYPE AND GENDER ON TOTAL INCIDENCE OF NEGOTIATION FOR MEANING. THE JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE PEDAGOGY AND PRACTICE[Internet]. 2009;2(4):238-270. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/181307/en

IEEE: Copy

S.O. TABATABAEI, “THE IMPACT OF TASK TYPE AND GENDER ON TOTAL INCIDENCE OF NEGOTIATION FOR MEANING,” THE JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE PEDAGOGY AND PRACTICE, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 238–270, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/181307/en

Related Journal Papers