COMPARISON OF BEAM HARDENING ARTIFACTS IN DENTAL IMPLANT SCANS MADE BY CBCT VERSUS CT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ESMAEILI F.; JOHARI M.; HADADI P.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Research in Dental Sciences Year:2012 | Volume:9 | Issue:3 (33) Page(s): 140-145

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,568

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF BEAM HARDENING ARTIFACTS IN DENTAL IMPLANT SCANS MADE BY CBCT VERSUS CT

Author(s)

ESMAEILI F. | JOHARI M. | HADADI P. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHYQ3

CONE BEAMQ2

ARTIFACTQ2

DENTAL IMPLANTQ2

Abstract

Background and Aim: CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CBCT) is an alternative to a CT scan in dental treatments. Metals used in dentistry may cause production of ARTIFACTs due to beam hardening phenomenon. The aim of this study was to compare the beam hardening ARTIFACTs produced in New Tom VG, PlanmecaPromax 3D, Max and Somatom Sensation 64-Slice CT.Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study an implant drilling model was used [IMP 1003-L-HD].The implants (Dentis) were placed in the canine, premolar and molar areas. The identical images were evaluated by two radiologists. The number of ARTIFACTs in each image was determined using the scale provide due to reference books Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare mean values of data.Results: NewTom VG had the maximum resolution (4.53±0.48) and PlanmecaPromax had the lowest resolution. (1.8±0.84). The results showed significant difference between the three Scanners (P<0.001).Conclusion: Given the high quality of the images produced by NewTom VG and the lower exposure dosesand costs in comparison to CT, the use of this scanner in dental procedures is recommended, especially in patients with extensive restorations, multiple prostheses and previous implants.

Cites

EFFICACY OF CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL PERIAPICAL RADIOGRAPHY IN DETECTING STRIP ROOT PERFORATIONS

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ESMAEILI, F., JOHARI, M., & HADADI, P.. (2012). COMPARISON OF BEAM HARDENING ARTIFACTS IN DENTAL IMPLANT SCANS MADE BY CBCT VERSUS CT. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL SCIENCES, 9(3 (33)), 140-145. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/184682/en

Vancouver: Copy

ESMAEILI F., JOHARI M., HADADI P.. COMPARISON OF BEAM HARDENING ARTIFACTS IN DENTAL IMPLANT SCANS MADE BY CBCT VERSUS CT. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2012;9(3 (33)):140-145. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/184682/en

IEEE: Copy

F. ESMAEILI, M. JOHARI, and P. HADADI, “COMPARISON OF BEAM HARDENING ARTIFACTS IN DENTAL IMPLANT SCANS MADE BY CBCT VERSUS CT,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL SCIENCES, vol. 9, no. 3 (33), pp. 140–145, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/184682/en

Related Journal Papers