COMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL PCR AND PCR - ELISA FOR DETECTION OF BRUCELLA MELITENSIS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSSEINI DOUST REZA; KHORAMABADI NIMA; MOHABATI MOBAREZ ASHRAF; TBARAI BAHMAN BAHMAN; MIRNEJAD REZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES Year:2011 | Volume:1 | Issue:1 Page(s): 25-30

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,381

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL PCR AND PCR - ELISA FOR DETECTION OF BRUCELLA MELITENSIS

Author(s)

Keywords

PCR – ELISAQ1

BRUCELLA MELITENSISQ1

PCRQ1

Abstract

Molecular detection techniques are believed to be key tools for both prevention and treatment follow up of brucellosis within live stock and human beings. Consequently rapid, reliable, easy to perform and automated systems for Brucella detection are urgently needed to allow early diagnosis and adequate antibiotic therapy in time. Brucellosis is a worldwide re-emerging zoonosis causing high economic losses and severe human disease. In attempt to improve current molecular detection of BRUCELLA MELITENSIS, we compared a conventional PCR with PCR- ELISA, to detect brucella genome within standard strains and clinical isolates. Primer sets based on “omp-31” sequence of B. melitensis 16M were designed. The primer specificity was checked with appropriate online bioinformatics softwares. The primer specificity was also confirmed by testing the reaction with non-Brucella strains. A biotinylated probe complementary to an internal sequence of the PCR products was designed. The labeled non-specific fragments bound to streptavidin-coated wells, saturating the solid phase streptavidin by biotin-streptavidin interaction. Compared with conventional PCR, the PCR- ELISA proved to have more sensitivity for Brucella genome after appropriate optimization. Few human serum, whole blood and also different affected tissue samples from slaughtered livestock with brucellosis were used for protocol evaluation. Further samples should be tested before final conclusion about the results.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HOSSEINI DOUST, REZA, KHORAMABADI, NIMA, MOHABATI MOBAREZ, ASHRAF, TBARAI BAHMAN, BAHMAN, & MIRNEJAD, REZA. (2011). COMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL PCR AND PCR - ELISA FOR DETECTION OF BRUCELLA MELITENSIS. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 1(1), 25-30. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/188768/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOSSEINI DOUST REZA, KHORAMABADI NIMA, MOHABATI MOBAREZ ASHRAF, TBARAI BAHMAN BAHMAN, MIRNEJAD REZA. COMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL PCR AND PCR - ELISA FOR DETECTION OF BRUCELLA MELITENSIS. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES[Internet]. 2011;1(1):25-30. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/188768/en

IEEE: Copy

REZA HOSSEINI DOUST, NIMA KHORAMABADI, ASHRAF MOHABATI MOBAREZ, BAHMAN TBARAI BAHMAN, and REZA MIRNEJAD, “COMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL PCR AND PCR - ELISA FOR DETECTION OF BRUCELLA MELITENSIS,” JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/188768/en

Related Journal Papers