COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCHLEIERMACHER’S HERMENEUTICAL VIEWS AND OSOUL-E FIQH SCHOLARS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZAKERI MAHDI; MUSAVI SEYED JABER

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy of religion Year:2015 | Volume:11 | Issue:4 Page(s): 645-664

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

859

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCHLEIERMACHER’S HERMENEUTICAL VIEWS AND OSOUL-E FIQH SCHOLARS

Author(s)

ZAKERI MAHDI | MUSAVI SEYED JABER | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

GRAMMATICAL INTERPRETATIONQ2

INTENTION OF AUTHORQ2

OSOUL-E- FIQHQ2

SCHLEIERMACHERQ2

TECHNICAL INTERPRETATIONQ2

Abstract

Both Olama-i- Osoul- Fiqh - in Islam- and Schle ierrnacher- in westem thought- have the same hermeneutical viewpoint, i.e. achieving the INTENTION OF AUTHOR. For achieving this goal, SCHLEIERMACHER starts with two phases of grammatical and TECHNICAL INTERPRETATION and explains them. But Moslem scholars (Olama-i- Osoul) in order to attaining to the author’s intention, set forth a chai n of I iteral and rational rules which is common among all rational scholars. In this paper, beside comparing these two hermeneutical view and explaining their similarities and differences, we will conclude that Moslem scholar’s theory is preferred to SCHLEIERMACHER’s for its internal consistency, and leaves no rooms for anomalous gestures.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ZAKERI, MAHDI, & MUSAVI, SEYED JABER. (2015). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCHLEIERMACHER’S HERMENEUTICAL VIEWS AND OSOUL-E FIQH SCHOLARS. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION, 11(4), 645-664. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/190597/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZAKERI MAHDI, MUSAVI SEYED JABER. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCHLEIERMACHER’S HERMENEUTICAL VIEWS AND OSOUL-E FIQH SCHOLARS. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION[Internet]. 2015;11(4):645-664. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/190597/en

IEEE: Copy

MAHDI ZAKERI, and SEYED JABER MUSAVI, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCHLEIERMACHER’S HERMENEUTICAL VIEWS AND OSOUL-E FIQH SCHOLARS,” PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 645–664, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/190597/en

Related Journal Papers