EVALUATION AND CRITIQUE OF KANT’S PROPOSITIONS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AHMADI AHMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy of religion Year:2010 | Volume:7 | Issue:7 Page(s): 5-17

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,332

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION AND CRITIQUE OF KANT’S PROPOSITIONS

Author(s)

AHMADI AHMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

INTUITIVE KNOWLEDGEQ2

INTUITIONQ2

UNIVERSALITYQ2

A-POSTERIORI / A-PRIORIQ3

ANALYSISQ3

Abstract

In the “Critique of Pure Reason (Kritik der reinen Vernunft) ” Kant apply the ‘judgment’ as an entry to his philosophical system and according to which he offers Quadra division of propositions and with analyzing of this propositions he try to reach his implications and results. So basic philosophical categories like possibility of metaphysics, Causality, UNIVERSALITY, Necessity, explanation of Natural Science and so on, bases on this division of proposition.But if we prove that he was wrong in his initial steps and there are other modes for explanation of these categories (e.g. UNIVERSALITY, Necessity and etc), we could cancel the bases of many of his conceptions.In this article we chose another mode and show that his idea is controvertible. We clarify that all the propositions are a- Posteriori.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AHMADI, AHMAD. (2010). EVALUATION AND CRITIQUE OF KANT’S PROPOSITIONS. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION, 7(7), 5-17. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/190614/en

Vancouver: Copy

AHMADI AHMAD. EVALUATION AND CRITIQUE OF KANT’S PROPOSITIONS. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION[Internet]. 2010;7(7):5-17. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/190614/en

IEEE: Copy

AHMAD AHMADI, “EVALUATION AND CRITIQUE OF KANT’S PROPOSITIONS,” PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 5–17, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/190614/en

Related Journal Papers