COMPARISON OF ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT PLACEMENT OF JEJUNOSTOMY TUBE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FARJAMI AMIN; NABILOU BAHRAM; YUSEFZADEH HASAN; MAHMOODLOU RAHIM

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Nursing And Midwifery Journal Year:2017 | Volume:14 | Issue:11 (88) Page(s): 960-968

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

593

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT PLACEMENT OF JEJUNOSTOMY TUBE

Author(s)

FARJAMI AMIN | NABILOU BAHRAM | YUSEFZADEH HASAN | MAHMOODLOU RAHIM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ESOPHAGEAL CANCERQ2

ESOPHAGECTOMYQ2

JEJUNOSTOMYQ2

Abstract

Background & Aims: Maintaining the nutritional and metabolic condition is one of the consequential pillars in the post-operative care. Feeding through a JEJUNOSTOMY Tube (JT) has been advocated in patients who undergo major operations on the upper gastrointestinal tract to enhance and accelerate an early enteral feeding. The present study aimed to examine benefits and complications of a JT insertion in such patients.Materials & Methods: This quasi experimental and case-control study was performed in 2009-2014 on 100 patients who underwent ESOPHAGECTOMY. Patients were divided into two groups. In the case group, JEJUNOSTOMY Tube was inserted for 50 patients while control group was fed normally and through intravenous injection. In this study, the clinical and economic aspects of the two groups were recorded and compared. Descriptive and analytic statistics were used to analyze the data.Results: According to the results of this study, length of hospital stay and the beginning of oral intake interval were significantly shorter in the JEJUNOSTOMY group (P=0.02). Distention in JEJUNOSTOMY group was significantly more than other group (P=0.04). The total cost of hospitalization in JEJUNOSTOMY group was significantly lower (P<0.001). In this study, there were no cases of infection and serious complications leading to death While erythema (%4), pneumonia (%4), urinary tract infection (%6), anastomotic leak (%10) and, catheter obstruction (%12) were seen in patients of JEJUNOSTOMY group.Conclusion: JT is a safe and saving approach in nutritional support of patients after ESOPHAGECTOMY and its routine insertion are recommended.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

FARJAMI, AMIN, NABILOU, BAHRAM, YUSEFZADEH, HASAN, & MAHMOODLOU, RAHIM. (2017). COMPARISON OF ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT PLACEMENT OF JEJUNOSTOMY TUBE. JOURNAL OF URMIA NURSING AND MIDWIFERY FACULTY, 14(11 (88)), 960-968. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/190973/en

Vancouver: Copy

FARJAMI AMIN, NABILOU BAHRAM, YUSEFZADEH HASAN, MAHMOODLOU RAHIM. COMPARISON OF ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT PLACEMENT OF JEJUNOSTOMY TUBE. JOURNAL OF URMIA NURSING AND MIDWIFERY FACULTY[Internet]. 2017;14(11 (88)):960-968. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/190973/en

IEEE: Copy

AMIN FARJAMI, BAHRAM NABILOU, HASAN YUSEFZADEH, and RAHIM MAHMOODLOU, “COMPARISON OF ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT PLACEMENT OF JEJUNOSTOMY TUBE,” JOURNAL OF URMIA NURSING AND MIDWIFERY FACULTY, vol. 14, no. 11 (88), pp. 960–968, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/190973/en

Related Journal Papers