A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF SOME VIEWS ON ATONEMENT DOCTRINE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KASHFI A.R.; ASADI S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Comparative Theology Year:2011 | Volume:2 | Issue:5 Page(s): 17-34

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

972

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF SOME VIEWS ON ATONEMENT DOCTRINE

Author(s)

KASHFI A.R. | ASADI S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ATONEMENT DOCTRINEQ2

SINQ2

RANSOM THEORYQ2

MORAL EXEMPLAR THEORYQ2

SATISFACTION THEORYQ2

Abstract

On the basis of "ATONEMENT DOCTRINE", Christ’s severe suffering and sacrificial death led to God’s forgiveness of mankind’s SINs. There are several theories on this doctrine, the most important of which are three: “Ransom Theory”, “Moral Exemplar Theory”, and “Satisfaction Theory”. This paper presents a brief introduction to these theories and a critical consideration of challenges and answers to them. To this aim, this paper considers the answers of Thomas Aquinas, Philip Quinn and Richard Swinburne. The paper shows that the ATONEMENT DOCTRINE cannot be logically defended and each of the answers to its difficulties causes new challenges and antinomies. Nevertheless, the Swinburne’s theory has fewer difficulties than the others, although it also cannot answer to some important questions.

Cites

No record.

References

ORIGINAL SIN

Cite

APA: Copy

KASHFI, A.R., & ASADI, S.. (2011). A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF SOME VIEWS ON ATONEMENT DOCTRINE. COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY, 2(5), 17-34. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/191824/en

Vancouver: Copy

KASHFI A.R., ASADI S.. A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF SOME VIEWS ON ATONEMENT DOCTRINE. COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY[Internet]. 2011;2(5):17-34. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/191824/en

IEEE: Copy

A.R. KASHFI, and S. ASADI, “A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF SOME VIEWS ON ATONEMENT DOCTRINE,” COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 17–34, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/191824/en

Related Journal Papers