A METHODOLOGICAL COMPARATIVE RESEARCH BETWEEN SHEIKH SADOGH AND SHEIKH MOFID' THEOLOGICAL THEORY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NEYAZI M.; MAHMOODI A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Comparative Theology Year:2012 | Volume:2 | Issue:6 Page(s): 77-94

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

731

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A METHODOLOGICAL COMPARATIVE RESEARCH BETWEEN SHEIKH SADOGH AND SHEIKH MOFID' THEOLOGICAL THEORY

Author(s)

NEYAZI M. | MAHMOODI A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SHEIKH MOFIDQ2

SHEIKH SADOGHQ2

REASONQ1

NARRATIONQ2

Abstract

Islamic theologians did not take a specific method to prove their religious beliefs and answer to the objections. Thus, we have tried in this article to research and compare between two known Shiite theologians' theological methods and foundations those are SHEIKH SADOGH from Qom School and SHEIKH MOFID from Baghdad School. So it would be clear the status of REASON and NARRATION in these theological scholars' viewpoints. The ratio of their uses of REASON and NARRATION in religious doctrines and answering to the objections have been evaluated and proved that SHEIKH SADOGH have preferred the NARRATION method in proving the beliefs but not mean that he has left REASON at all, but he has choose the NARRATIONs those have rational argument dimensions. In the other hand SHEIKH MOFID in giving a special scope to REASON and having a rationalistic attitude tried to prove the religious doctrines and defend. In proving our assumption, we did not rely on the generalities and used the two scholars' written works.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NEYAZI, M., & MAHMOODI, A.. (2012). A METHODOLOGICAL COMPARATIVE RESEARCH BETWEEN SHEIKH SADOGH AND SHEIKH MOFID' THEOLOGICAL THEORY. COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY, 2(6), 77-94. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/191862/en

Vancouver: Copy

NEYAZI M., MAHMOODI A.. A METHODOLOGICAL COMPARATIVE RESEARCH BETWEEN SHEIKH SADOGH AND SHEIKH MOFID' THEOLOGICAL THEORY. COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY[Internet]. 2012;2(6):77-94. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/191862/en

IEEE: Copy

M. NEYAZI, and A. MAHMOODI, “A METHODOLOGICAL COMPARATIVE RESEARCH BETWEEN SHEIKH SADOGH AND SHEIKH MOFID' THEOLOGICAL THEORY,” COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 77–94, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/191862/en

Related Journal Papers