PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS SYSTEMS: A REVIEW OF METHODOLOGIES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MANSORIAN MAHSA; MARATEB HAMID REZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Health System Research Year:2015 | Volume:11 | Issue:3 Page(s): 445-458

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

973

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS SYSTEMS: A REVIEW OF METHODOLOGIES

Author(s)

MANSORIAN MAHSA | MARATEB HAMID REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSISQ3

DATA MININGQ3

PATTERN RECOGNITIONQ3

VALIDATIONQ3

Abstract

Background: Nowadays, COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS systems are widely used in medicine. These systems could assist medical doctors in early correct diagnosis of diseases. The performance of such systems must be correctly assessed. In this paper, the performance criteria of these diagnosis systems are taken into account.Methods: The diagnosis error of such systems was estimated based on the gold standard data using measures such as Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy, Precision, Area Under curve ROC (receiver operating characteristic), F-measure, Matthews correlation coefficient , etc. The advantages and disadvantages of those criteria were also discussed. Then, the performance of two Coronary Artery Disease diagnosis systems was assessed. The statistically significant superior method was identified using the McNemar’s test.Findings: Since the analyzed dataset was balanced, the overall performance of the diagnosis methods was assessed using the accuracy measure. The accuracy of the methods was 84% and 86%, respectively. The entire systems were not reliable since Type I error (Alpha) was not less than 0.05. However, the second system had acceptable statistical power (>80%). The diagnosis performance of those systems was “very good” (0.8<AUC<0.9). None of the methods was better than the other.Conclusion: The performance of the diagnosis systems must be assessed using the proper methods and criteria. Using different suitable performance measures, it is possible to assess the diagnosis performance of such systems in details.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MANSORIAN, MAHSA, & MARATEB, HAMID REZA. (2015). PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS SYSTEMS: A REVIEW OF METHODOLOGIES. HEALTH SYSTEM RESEARCH, 11(3), 445-458. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/192738/en

Vancouver: Copy

MANSORIAN MAHSA, MARATEB HAMID REZA. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS SYSTEMS: A REVIEW OF METHODOLOGIES. HEALTH SYSTEM RESEARCH[Internet]. 2015;11(3):445-458. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/192738/en

IEEE: Copy

MAHSA MANSORIAN, and HAMID REZA MARATEB, “PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS SYSTEMS: A REVIEW OF METHODOLOGIES,” HEALTH SYSTEM RESEARCH, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 445–458, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/192738/en

Related Journal Papers