AN EXPOSITION OF SCHMIDT-PETRI’S CRITIQUE ON GETTIER’S FIRST COUNTEREXAMPLE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZAREPUR MOHAMMAD SALEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy and Kalam Year:2010 | Volume:43 | Issue:1 Page(s): 51-68

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,350

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AN EXPOSITION OF SCHMIDT-PETRI’S CRITIQUE ON GETTIER’S FIRST COUNTEREXAMPLE

Author(s)

ZAREPUR MOHAMMAD SALEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

TRIPARTITE DEFINITION OF KNOWLEDGEQ2

GETTIER’S COUNTEREXAMPLESQ3

DEFINITE DESCRIPTIONQ3

RUSSELLQ2

STRAWSONQ3

DONNELLANQ3

Abstract

By introducing two counterexamples, Gettier claims that it is possible that a person S has true justified belief that P but fails to know that proposition. The proposition P in Gettier’s first counterexample includes a “definite description”. We try, in this article, to refute Gettier’s first counterexample by means of what RUSSELL, STRAWSON and DONNELLAN have said on the analysis of the propositions contained DEFINITE DESCRIPTIONs. More precisely, we will show that S doesn’t know that P because either he don’t believe that P or P is not true. It means that Gettier’s first counterexample cannot refute TRIPARTITE DEFINITION OF KNOWLEDGE.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

ZAREPUR, MOHAMMAD SALEH. (2010). AN EXPOSITION OF SCHMIDT-PETRI’S CRITIQUE ON GETTIER’S FIRST COUNTEREXAMPLE. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 43(1), 51-68. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198335/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZAREPUR MOHAMMAD SALEH. AN EXPOSITION OF SCHMIDT-PETRI’S CRITIQUE ON GETTIER’S FIRST COUNTEREXAMPLE. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2010;43(1):51-68. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198335/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD SALEH ZAREPUR, “AN EXPOSITION OF SCHMIDT-PETRI’S CRITIQUE ON GETTIER’S FIRST COUNTEREXAMPLE,” FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 51–68, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198335/en

Related Journal Papers