CRITICAL STUDY OF JOHN HICK’S RELIGIOUS PLURALISM

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ALIZAMANI AMIR ABBAS; NURI MARJAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy and Kalam Year:2010 | Volume:42 | Issue:1 Page(s): 85-106

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

883

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRITICAL STUDY OF JOHN HICK’S RELIGIOUS PLURALISM

Author(s)

ALIZAMANI AMIR ABBAS | NURI MARJAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HAVING CHILDQ3

ABSOLUTE APPROPRIATENESSQ3

INHERENT APPROPRIATENESSQ3

MARRIAGE CONTRACTQ2

Abstract

John Hick’s pluralism hypothesis is an endeavor from and within Christian tradition to explain the relation of Christianity with other world religions. His basically claim is that all religions epistemologically have the same value and do well in leading their followers to the ultimate salvation. For justifying his claim, Hick has to defend his hypothesis at two levels: first he has to defend the realism of religious statements (against non-realists), and second he has to defend the pluralistic interpretation of religious diversity (against exclusivists and inclusivists). However, it seems that pluralism model has intrinsic oppositions which are addressed in this article in three types of criticism. These criticisms will finally ascertain that Hick’s pluralistic model is: (1) not pluralistic, (2) not acceptable in Christian tradition, and (3) not successful in achieving its predetermined goal.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

ALIZAMANI, AMIR ABBAS, & NURI, MARJAN. (2010). CRITICAL STUDY OF JOHN HICK’S RELIGIOUS PLURALISM. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 42(1), 85-106. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198359/en

Vancouver: Copy

ALIZAMANI AMIR ABBAS, NURI MARJAN. CRITICAL STUDY OF JOHN HICK’S RELIGIOUS PLURALISM. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2010;42(1):85-106. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198359/en

IEEE: Copy

AMIR ABBAS ALIZAMANI, and MARJAN NURI, “CRITICAL STUDY OF JOHN HICK’S RELIGIOUS PLURALISM,” FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 85–106, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198359/en

Related Journal Papers