CRITICAL THINKING; THE ANALYSIS AND CRITICISM OF SOME DEFINITIONS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HODJATI SEYYED MOHAMMAD ALI; KHOSRAVANI MOHAMMAD MEHDI

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy and Kalam Year:2015 | Volume:47 | Issue:2 Page(s): 183-202

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

2,361

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRITICAL THINKING; THE ANALYSIS AND CRITICISM OF SOME DEFINITIONS

Author(s)

HODJATI SEYYED MOHAMMAD ALI | KHOSRAVANI MOHAMMAD MEHDI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CRITICAL THINKINGQ2

PEDAGOGYQ2

LOGICQ2

CREATIVE THINKINGQ2

JOHN DEWEYQ2

PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATIONQ2

Abstract

“CRITICAL THINKING” is a way of thinking and also is a title for an area of knowledge stemmed from Dewey in the PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION. Inthis article, after analyzing and criticizing some of the most notable definitions of CRITICAL THINKING, we will show that most thinkers believe that CRITICAL THINKING, as a general area of knowledge, is possible. Finally, arguing for the plausibility of the approaches that focus on CRITICAL THINKING as a process, and the idea that the “differences” between views are not “oppositions”, we conclude that Richard Paul’s view is the most comprehensive position. And the suggestion (made implicitly) is that CRITICAL THINKING is not just apedagogical matter, and demands some philosophical discussions.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HODJATI, SEYYED MOHAMMAD ALI, & KHOSRAVANI, MOHAMMAD MEHDI. (2015). CRITICAL THINKING; THE ANALYSIS AND CRITICISM OF SOME DEFINITIONS. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 47(2 ), 183-202. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198364/en

Vancouver: Copy

HODJATI SEYYED MOHAMMAD ALI, KHOSRAVANI MOHAMMAD MEHDI. CRITICAL THINKING; THE ANALYSIS AND CRITICISM OF SOME DEFINITIONS. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2015;47(2 ):183-202. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198364/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYYED MOHAMMAD ALI HODJATI, and MOHAMMAD MEHDI KHOSRAVANI, “CRITICAL THINKING; THE ANALYSIS AND CRITICISM OF SOME DEFINITIONS,” FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 47, no. 2 , pp. 183–202, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198364/en

Related Journal Papers