CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF COMMON-SENSE EXEGESIS OF MULLA SADRA’S THEORY OF PRINCIPALITY OF EXISTENCE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BANAN GHOLAMREZA; KAKAIE GHASEM

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy and Kalam Year:2015 | Volume:48 | Issue:1 Page(s): 35-50

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

617

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF COMMON-SENSE EXEGESIS OF MULLA SADRA’S THEORY OF PRINCIPALITY OF EXISTENCE

Author(s)

BANAN GHOLAMREZA | KAKAIE GHASEM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EXISTENCEQ2

MULLA SADRAQ2

PRINCIPALITY OF EXISTENCEQ2

QUIDDITYQ2

Abstract

Since Molla Sadra’s era, various exegeses have been made of the principality of EXISTENCE (isalat al-wujoud) and non-principality of QUIDDITY which can be placed in three distinct groups: 1) common-sense exegeses, 2) philosophical exegeses, and 3) mystical exegeses. Common-sense exegesis is the one derived from a common sense viewpoint of the universe, which presupposes the quiddities external. Philosophical exegesis is due to a rational and exact viewpoint of the QUIDDITY. In this view, QUIDDITY is considered something that is derived from the limitation of the EXISTENCE of the entities. Finally, mystical exegesis is one derived from the direct knowledge of the entities and in which QUIDDITY is simply some mental appearance. The article shows that philosophical and mystical exegeses are correct exegeses of principality, whereas common-sense exegesis is an incorrect one that is the result of an inexact view of the QUIDDITY.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BANAN, GHOLAMREZA, & KAKAIE, GHASEM. (2015). CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF COMMON-SENSE EXEGESIS OF MULLA SADRA’S THEORY OF PRINCIPALITY OF EXISTENCE. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 48(1 ), 35-50. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198391/en

Vancouver: Copy

BANAN GHOLAMREZA, KAKAIE GHASEM. CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF COMMON-SENSE EXEGESIS OF MULLA SADRA’S THEORY OF PRINCIPALITY OF EXISTENCE. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2015;48(1 ):35-50. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198391/en

IEEE: Copy

GHOLAMREZA BANAN, and GHASEM KAKAIE, “CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF COMMON-SENSE EXEGESIS OF MULLA SADRA’S THEORY OF PRINCIPALITY OF EXISTENCE,” FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 48, no. 1 , pp. 35–50, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198391/en

Related Journal Papers