A STUDY OF VALIDITY OF IMPLICATIONS OF PROOFS AN APPROACH TO IMAM KHOMEINI'S VIEWPOINT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AHMADI AKBAR; EMAM SEYED MOHAMMAD REZA; MOMENI ABEDIN; GHARAMALEKI ALI MAZHAR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law Year:2012 | Volume:44 | Issue:2 Page(s): 95-115

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

954

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A STUDY OF VALIDITY OF IMPLICATIONS OF PROOFS AN APPROACH TO IMAM KHOMEINI'S VIEWPOINT

Author(s)

AHMADI AKBAR | EMAM SEYED MOHAMMAD REZA | MOMENI ABEDIN | GHARAMALEKI ALI MAZHAR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

AUTHORIZED CONJECTURAL PROOF (AMARA)Q2

PRACTICAL PRINCIPLEQ3

THE CUSTOM OF THE WISEQ2

IMPLICATIONS OF PROOFSQ2

Abstract

Study of validity of IMPLICATIONS OF PROOFS is among fundamental discussions in both Usul al-Fiqh and Fiqh. Authorized conjectural proofs (amarat) and PRACTICAL PRINCIPLEs can have indirect juristic implications as they have direct ones. Investigation of validity of such indirect implications and effects is entitled investigation of validity of IMPLICATIONS OF PROOFS. Some Usulis hold that implications of authorized conjectural proofs are valid since the divine law-maker has treated them as knowledge and certitude while those of PRACTICAL PRINCIPLEs are not authorized because they are not treated so by the divine law-maker. Some other have accepted that difference but have argued that what proves validity of authorized conjectural proofs is unconditional with regard to their implications while what proves that of PRACTICAL PRINCIPLEs is not so. Imam Khomeini, however, holds that implications of authorized conjectural proofs are not valid because of being treated by the divine law-maker as knowledge and certitude. Rather, it is THE CUSTOM OF THE WISE that differentiates between implications of authorized conjectural proofs and PRACTICAL PRINCIPLEs.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AHMADI, AKBAR, EMAM, SEYED MOHAMMAD REZA, MOMENI, ABEDIN, & GHARAMALEKI, ALI MAZHAR. (2012). A STUDY OF VALIDITY OF IMPLICATIONS OF PROOFS AN APPROACH TO IMAM KHOMEINI'S VIEWPOINT. FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 44(2), 95-115. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198493/en

Vancouver: Copy

AHMADI AKBAR, EMAM SEYED MOHAMMAD REZA, MOMENI ABEDIN, GHARAMALEKI ALI MAZHAR. A STUDY OF VALIDITY OF IMPLICATIONS OF PROOFS AN APPROACH TO IMAM KHOMEINI'S VIEWPOINT. FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2012;44(2):95-115. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198493/en

IEEE: Copy

AKBAR AHMADI, SEYED MOHAMMAD REZA EMAM, ABEDIN MOMENI, and ALI MAZHAR GHARAMALEKI, “A STUDY OF VALIDITY OF IMPLICATIONS OF PROOFS AN APPROACH TO IMAM KHOMEINI'S VIEWPOINT,” FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 95–115, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198493/en

Related Journal Papers