THE VALIDITY OF RIJAL EXPERTS’ OPINIONS FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF CONJECTURES AUTHORIZED BY THE JUDGMENT OF THE WISE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAVAN ABDOLLAH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law Year:2014 | Volume:47 | Issue:1 Page(s): 77-93

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,040

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE VALIDITY OF RIJAL EXPERTS’ OPINIONS FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF CONJECTURES AUTHORIZED BY THE JUDGMENT OF THE WISE

Author(s)

JAVAN ABDOLLAH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

STATEMENT OF RIJAL EXPERTQ1

SINGLE REPORTQ2

TESTIMONYQ1

STATEMENT OF EXPERTSQ2

CLOSUREQ2

THE CONJECTURES AUTHORIZED BY THE WISEQ2

Abstract

Recognition of whether hadith transmitters are trustworthy, which is considered among necessary preliminaries of juristic deductions, is mostly dependent upon statements of rijal experts. In order to authenticate opinions of earlier rijal experts Muslim scholars have suggested some ways, such as authority of SINGLE REPORT, that of TESTIMONY, that of expert’s opinion, or the CLOSURE Proof each of which encountering some problems or, at least, some limitations and conditions in such a way that one cannot make acceptance of opinions of rijal experts dependent on them. While surveying and criticizing those ways, which presuppose that actualization of one of such designations is necessary for the departure from prohibition of acing on the basis of conjecture, the present essay proposes a perspective according to which actualization of a particular designation or causality of a specific factor plays no role in the authority of conjectures; rather, what causes departure from prohibition of acing on the basis of conjecture is that the opinion should reach a level that it could remove the wise’s state of perplexity in the position of action and propel them to the action. By authenticating such conjectures, which we call “conjectures authorized by the wise,” one can prove validity of most of statements of rijal experts concerning trustworthiness or otherwise of hadith transmitters.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAVAN, ABDOLLAH. (2014). THE VALIDITY OF RIJAL EXPERTS’ OPINIONS FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF CONJECTURES AUTHORIZED BY THE JUDGMENT OF THE WISE. FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 47(1), 77-93. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198495/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAVAN ABDOLLAH. THE VALIDITY OF RIJAL EXPERTS’ OPINIONS FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF CONJECTURES AUTHORIZED BY THE JUDGMENT OF THE WISE. FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2014;47(1):77-93. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198495/en

IEEE: Copy

ABDOLLAH JAVAN, “THE VALIDITY OF RIJAL EXPERTS’ OPINIONS FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF CONJECTURES AUTHORIZED BY THE JUDGMENT OF THE WISE,” FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 77–93, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198495/en

Related Journal Papers