EVALUATING INFLUENTIAL FACTORS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING (EMA) ADOPTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ALAMSHAH SAYYED AMIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING Year:2014 | Volume:7 | Issue:22 Page(s): 89-108

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

3,300

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATING INFLUENTIAL FACTORS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING (EMA) ADOPTION

Author(s)

ALAMSHAH SAYYED AMIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTINGQ2

RESISTIVE ECONOMYQ2

CONSUMPTION PATTERN REFORMSQ2

TARGETED SUBSIDIESQ2

WATER & ENERGY ACCOUNTINGQ2

ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTINGQ2

Abstract

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING (EMA) as a management tool assists in improving financial and environmental performance through enhanced environmental accountability. This study accomplished with to focus of attention upon EMA, for to identify factors influencing EMA adoption. For achieving the research objective, established 6 hypothesises. For hypothesises testing, sent questionnaire to key personnel with three different functions (i.e. financial Manager, chief accountant and management accounting headman). After data coding, those tested and analyzed by T-test. Results indicated 1) Low priority of accounting for environmental costs 2) Resistance to conventional accounting practices change 3) Efficiency or financial considerations 4) Expert member and resource constraints 5) Difficulties in collecting or allocating environmental costs 6) External pressure, are factors influencing the decision to adopt, or not to adopt, EMA in mentioned corporations. Finally provided suggestions made by this study for EMA adoption. Apart from the theoretical extension to this area of research, the results and findings of this study supported the uses and applications of EMA by our industries. Much more can, and should, be done by corporations in relation to how they account for the environment. This can provide benefits not only for the sector itself, but also for the environment in which we live.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ALAMSHAH, SAYYED AMIN. (2014). EVALUATING INFLUENTIAL FACTORS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING (EMA) ADOPTION. MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING, 7(22), 89-108. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198780/en

Vancouver: Copy

ALAMSHAH SAYYED AMIN. EVALUATING INFLUENTIAL FACTORS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING (EMA) ADOPTION. MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING[Internet]. 2014;7(22):89-108. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198780/en

IEEE: Copy

SAYYED AMIN ALAMSHAH, “EVALUATING INFLUENTIAL FACTORS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING (EMA) ADOPTION,” MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING, vol. 7, no. 22, pp. 89–108, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198780/en

Related Journal Papers