مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

878
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR AGRICULTURAL POSITIONING USING GPS AND IMU

Pages

  285-295

Abstract

 In this research, four different positioning methods were compared in order to evaluate their accuracy, using a remotely controlled robot on a specific route. These methods included: using a single GPS module, combining the data from three GPS modules, using an INERTIAL MEASUREMENT Unit (IMU), and GPS/IMU DATA FUSION. The comparison of these four methods showed that GPS/IMU DATA FUSION along with a KALMAN FILTER was the most precise method, having a root mean square error of 23.4cm. Integrating the data acquired simultaneously from three GPS modules with fixed and equally spaced position and far enough from each other, had a root mean square error of 31.3cm was the second most precise method. Also analysis of the IMU data showed that due to cumulative errors, it was not a suitable method using a single IMU for positioning.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    GOLI, H., MINAEI, S., JAFARI, A., KEYHANI, A., HAJIAHMAD, A., ABDOLMALEKI, H., & MOHAMMAD BORGHEEI, A.. (2015). COMPARISON OF FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR AGRICULTURAL POSITIONING USING GPS AND IMU. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY, 4(2), 285-295. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/201376/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    GOLI H., MINAEI S., JAFARI A., KEYHANI A., HAJIAHMAD A., ABDOLMALEKI H., MOHAMMAD BORGHEEI A.. COMPARISON OF FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR AGRICULTURAL POSITIONING USING GPS AND IMU. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY[Internet]. 2015;4(2):285-295. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/201376/en

    IEEE: Copy

    H. GOLI, S. MINAEI, A. JAFARI, A. KEYHANI, A. HAJIAHMAD, H. ABDOLMALEKI, and A. MOHAMMAD BORGHEEI, “COMPARISON OF FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR AGRICULTURAL POSITIONING USING GPS AND IMU,” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 285–295, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/201376/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button