COMPARISON OF FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR AGRICULTURAL POSITIONING USING GPS AND IMU

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GOLI H.; MINAEI S.; JAFARI A.; KEYHANI A.; HAJIAHMAD A.; ABDOLMALEKI H.; MOHAMMAD BORGHEEI A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY Year:2015 | Volume:4 | Issue:2 Page(s): 285-295

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

878

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR AGRICULTURAL POSITIONING USING GPS AND IMU

Author(s)

Keywords

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMSQ2

INERTIAL MEASUREMENTQ1

DATA FUSIONQ2

KALMAN FILTERQ2

Abstract

In this research, four different positioning methods were compared in order to evaluate their accuracy, using a remotely controlled robot on a specific route. These methods included: using a single GPS module, combining the data from three GPS modules, using an INERTIAL MEASUREMENT Unit (IMU), and GPS/IMU DATA FUSION. The comparison of these four methods showed that GPS/IMU DATA FUSION along with a KALMAN FILTER was the most precise method, having a root mean square error of 23.4cm. Integrating the data acquired simultaneously from three GPS modules with fixed and equally spaced position and far enough from each other, had a root mean square error of 31.3cm was the second most precise method. Also analysis of the IMU data showed that due to cumulative errors, it was not a suitable method using a single IMU for positioning.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GOLI, H., MINAEI, S., JAFARI, A., KEYHANI, A., HAJIAHMAD, A., ABDOLMALEKI, H., & MOHAMMAD BORGHEEI, A.. (2015). COMPARISON OF FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR AGRICULTURAL POSITIONING USING GPS AND IMU. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY, 4(2), 285-295. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/201376/en

Vancouver: Copy

GOLI H., MINAEI S., JAFARI A., KEYHANI A., HAJIAHMAD A., ABDOLMALEKI H., MOHAMMAD BORGHEEI A.. COMPARISON OF FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR AGRICULTURAL POSITIONING USING GPS AND IMU. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY[Internet]. 2015;4(2):285-295. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/201376/en

IEEE: Copy

H. GOLI, S. MINAEI, A. JAFARI, A. KEYHANI, A. HAJIAHMAD, H. ABDOLMALEKI, and A. MOHAMMAD BORGHEEI, “COMPARISON OF FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR AGRICULTURAL POSITIONING USING GPS AND IMU,” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 285–295, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/201376/en

Related Journal Papers