مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

16,787
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

RAPID DETECTION OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI BY USING PCR MOLECULAR METHOD COMPARED WITH RAPID UREASE TEST

Pages

  97-105

Abstract

 Aim and Background: HELICOBACTER PYLORI has been recognized as a major risk factor for the development of gastritis, gastric and duodenal ulcers and gastric cancer. Various methods have been known to detect this microorganism and the most common method especially in patients undergoing endoscopy is RAPID UREASE TEST (RUT), but this test is potential to give false positive and negative results. Therefore, using a rapid, simple but high-precision method is needed to confirm this test in laboratories. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of RUT compared to PCR molecular method for the diagnosis of H.pylori.Materials and Methods: This study was carried out on 100 BIOPSY samples collected from dyspeptic patients attending the endoscopy. The RAPID UREASE TEST was performed on all samples and the PCR test was conducted with designed primers on GLMM GENE. Diagnostic values of RUT and PCR were evaluated using SPSS software.Results: The product of optimized PCR with 201bp length correctly amplified and observed on electrophoreses gel. Evaluation of the selected primers with various DNA demonstrated high accuracy. Sensitivity of the test was 10 CFU with 100% specificity. In this study, 85% of specimens were detected with PCR whereas only 63% of them were detected by the RUT.Conclusion: In this study, it has been approved that PCR can be used for the diagnosis of H.pylori on clinical specimens because it is highly sensitive, specific and can be used on BIOPSY samples from RUT.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ALLAHKARAMI, SOMAYEH, SHAHHOSSEINY, MOHAMMAD HASSAN, HAYATI RUDBARI, NASIM, & ESMAILI, DAVOOD. (2014). RAPID DETECTION OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI BY USING PCR MOLECULAR METHOD COMPARED WITH RAPID UREASE TEST. NEW CELLULAR & MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 5(15), 97-105. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/204379/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ALLAHKARAMI SOMAYEH, SHAHHOSSEINY MOHAMMAD HASSAN, HAYATI RUDBARI NASIM, ESMAILI DAVOOD. RAPID DETECTION OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI BY USING PCR MOLECULAR METHOD COMPARED WITH RAPID UREASE TEST. NEW CELLULAR & MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2014;5(15):97-105. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/204379/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SOMAYEH ALLAHKARAMI, MOHAMMAD HASSAN SHAHHOSSEINY, NASIM HAYATI RUDBARI, and DAVOOD ESMAILI, “RAPID DETECTION OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI BY USING PCR MOLECULAR METHOD COMPARED WITH RAPID UREASE TEST,” NEW CELLULAR & MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, vol. 5, no. 15, pp. 97–105, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/204379/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button