مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,736
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

RUSSELL'S VIEW ON INDUCTION

Pages

  93-114

Abstract

 The dilemma of induction is one of the most difficult philosophical problems that if solved many philosophical problems could be explained and many conclusions could scientifically be justifiable. Bertrand Russell, one of the greatest analyzer philosophers of the twentieth century, has tried to solve the problem of induction.From the Russell's point of view the dilemma of induction is a question of how to justify THE GENERAL PROVISIONS, causal laws, and indirect knowledge. He appealed that the PRINCIPLE OF UNIFORMITY OF NATURE is not enough to solve this problem, and then he suggested the reception of induction as a principle. Based on THE PRINCIPLE OF INDUCTION, the more the number of concurrences of A and B the greater is the possibility of perpetual coincidence between them and when the number of concurrences is enough constant conjunction of A with B is almost certain.According to Russell, THE PRINCIPLE OF INDUCTION is neither rationally provable nor empirically verifiable, but the principle should be accepted because of its natural evidence and finally because of its consequences. According to Russell the metalogical principles cause the PROBABILITY of generalization lean toward CERTAINTY. Finally he notes although induction can't provide us with theoretical CERTAINTY (logical and mathematical) but its near CERTAINTY PROBABILITY is more than that of a metaphysical dogma.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    FARHANIAN, FATEMEH, & ABDOLLAHI, MOHAMMAD ALI. (2012). RUSSELL'S VIEW ON INDUCTION. FALSAFE-YE ELM (PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE), 2(1), 93-114. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/205946/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    FARHANIAN FATEMEH, ABDOLLAHI MOHAMMAD ALI. RUSSELL'S VIEW ON INDUCTION. FALSAFE-YE ELM (PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE)[Internet]. 2012;2(1):93-114. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/205946/en

    IEEE: Copy

    FATEMEH FARHANIAN, and MOHAMMAD ALI ABDOLLAHI, “RUSSELL'S VIEW ON INDUCTION,” FALSAFE-YE ELM (PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 93–114, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/205946/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button