CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR ASSESSING MASTER DEGREE DISSERTATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FEIZY TAHEREH; GRAMIPOUR MASOUD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PERSPECTIVE Year:2011 | Volume:2 | Issue:6 Page(s): 115-134

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

3,535

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR ASSESSING MASTER DEGREE DISSERTATION

Author(s)

FEIZY TAHEREH | GRAMIPOUR MASOUD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EVALUATIONQ2

CRITERIAQ2

STANDARDQ2

DISSERTATION ASSESSMENTQ2

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the major and minor CRITERIA and qualitative and scoring STANDARDs for assessing written master degree dissertation of behavior sciences fields (Management, Psychology, Education and sociology) of Payam Noor University. 172 assessment CRITERIA were developed after literature review and interview with research method and assessment and measurement professionals, and then were used to construct a questionnaire with likert and rating scales. Then 112 teachers were selected randomly from working and related teachers of PNU in the aforementioned fields. The calculated Cronbach Alpha values for the questionnaire were about 0.99 which indicate the high reliability of the scales. Results of binomial tests with more than 99 percent of confidence show that the teachers confirm the developed CRITERIA. Also based on teacher's opinion, the CRITERIA were classified in three STANDARD categories of: acceptance with no modification, acceptance with minor modification and acceptance with major modification. Finally, scoring STANDARDs were estimated by principle component factor analysis.

Cites

THE CHALLENGE OF THE QUALITY OF PHD THESIS IN IRAN (BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF VALUE CHAIN)

References

Cite

APA: Copy

FEIZY, TAHEREH, & GRAMIPOUR, MASOUD. (2011). CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR ASSESSING MASTER DEGREE DISSERTATION. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PERSPECTIVE, 2(6), 115-134. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/207583/en

Vancouver: Copy

FEIZY TAHEREH, GRAMIPOUR MASOUD. CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR ASSESSING MASTER DEGREE DISSERTATION. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PERSPECTIVE[Internet]. 2011;2(6):115-134. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/207583/en

IEEE: Copy

TAHEREH FEIZY, and MASOUD GRAMIPOUR, “CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR ASSESSING MASTER DEGREE DISSERTATION,” JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PERSPECTIVE, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 115–134, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/207583/en

Related Journal Papers