مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,238
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ARISTOTLE'S ESSENTIALISM AND BRIAN ELLIS'S SCIENTIFIC ESSENTIALISM

Pages

  29-46

Abstract

 Essentialism like many philosophical subjects is rooted in the ideas of Greek philosophers. This theory is related to the stability, motion and change. In fact, a reasonable explanation of the motion and change was interest of philosophers. Aristotle's theory is in this field. This theory that concerns to laws of nature was the most notable philosophical achievements and metaphysical foundation for the science of that time. Aristotle was able to study species of plants and animals as a natural kind because of variety and apparent difference between them. In his view, any natural kind acts in goal-oriented. From this perspective, ARISTOTLE'S ESSENTIALISM has been criticism, so was not a serious activity on this topic till 20 century. Brian Ellis is formulated his scientific essentialism with offers to NATURAL KINDS and DISPOSITIONAL PROPERTIES. He offers a variety of criteria for natural kind but he does not accept biological kind because it does not satisfy some of the criteria. He claims that his scientific essentialism is realistic. The NATURAL KINDS of this theory are in transition and interact to each other. What appears depends on a variety of roles of NATURAL KINDS that participating in the process. The paper presents two ideas of Aristotle and Ellis' essentialism and pays to new essentialism functionality. This study presents why Ellis does not accept NATURAL KIND IN BIOLOGY even genetic structure and unlike the traditional view, according to close relationship between the definition and explanation, there is no such connection in Ellis's essentialism.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOAYERZADEH, MARYAM. (2012). ARISTOTLE'S ESSENTIALISM AND BRIAN ELLIS'S SCIENTIFIC ESSENTIALISM. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS, 7(20), 29-46. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/207838/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOAYERZADEH MARYAM. ARISTOTLE'S ESSENTIALISM AND BRIAN ELLIS'S SCIENTIFIC ESSENTIALISM. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS[Internet]. 2012;7(20):29-46. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/207838/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MARYAM MOAYERZADEH, “ARISTOTLE'S ESSENTIALISM AND BRIAN ELLIS'S SCIENTIFIC ESSENTIALISM,” PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS, vol. 7, no. 20, pp. 29–46, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/207838/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button