مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,359
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS, POLITICAL NOT METAPHYSICAL

Pages

  113-141

Abstract

RAWLS’ thoughts can be divided into two significant periods. In his first period, he is impressed by Kant's ethical philosophy but in second period, he goes far from abstract philosophy and tries to make his theory pragmatic, scientific and methodological. Most of philosophers in enlightenment and after, try to applied metaphysical presuppositions for establishing their philosophical frameworks. Many Philosophical schools have been established by these presuppositions. Even some states have been applied some of that schools same as utilitarianism. For instance: Immanuel Kant had been established his philosophical framework by applying ethical doctrine or LOCK had been established his philosophical theories by different interpretation of Christianity. But is RAWLS that he called himself as follower of named philosophers, imitate their method? Or same as his claim that: he tried to establish his theory without depending of any metaphysical presuppositions and just call it merely POLITICAL CONCEPT. In this article, firstly, introductory about LOCK's theory of justification and Kant's effect on RAWLS has been considered then, I just try investigating of RAWLS claim of JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS is POLITICAL CONCEPT, not metaphysical.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SAFI, MOHAMMAD ALI. (2012). JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS, POLITICAL NOT METAPHYSICAL. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS, 7(20), 113-141. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/207840/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SAFI MOHAMMAD ALI. JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS, POLITICAL NOT METAPHYSICAL. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS[Internet]. 2012;7(20):113-141. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/207840/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOHAMMAD ALI SAFI, “JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS, POLITICAL NOT METAPHYSICAL,” PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS, vol. 7, no. 20, pp. 113–141, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/207840/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button