STUDENT SATISFACTION ON GETTING FEEDBACK IN CLINICAL TEACHING

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AHMADY S.; ZAND S.; NIKRAVAN MOFRAD M.; RAFIEI F.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Medical Education and Development Year:2015 | Volume:10 | Issue:3 Page(s): 208-218

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,030

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

STUDENT SATISFACTION ON GETTING FEEDBACK IN CLINICAL TEACHING

Author(s)

AHMADY S. | ZAND S. | NIKRAVAN MOFRAD M. | RAFIEI F. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EEDBACKQ2

CLINICAL EDUCATIONQ2

NURSING STUDENTSQ2

Abstract

Introduction: Among the factors that are involved in medical education, undoubtedly fEEDBACK is a special place. FEEDBACK is a link between assessment and learning. Student satisfaction has an important indicator in the quality of learning and teaching. Learning is also associated with the satisfaction of students from the courses. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of fEEDBACK in CLINICAL EDUCATION.Methods: This quasi-experimental study was performed on all of the seventh term NURSING STUDENTS in the faculty of Nursing and Midwifery in Arak and shazand cities. In the first semester in 93-94, they were trained post-CCU ward. The participants were selected through the census procedure. The students in both groups (intervention and control) were selected randomly in subgroups of 7 and 8 participants. In each group, the students were trained for 4 weeks in the morning shift. To determine the effects of these two methods, after completion of each of the training courses, all of the students completed the questionnaires and the results were compared.Results: The results showed that the intervention and the control groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics (gender, indigenous and student work experience) and there was no statistically significant difference. Therefore, the mean of overall student satisfaction scores in the intervention group was higher than the control group. In all of the levels, the intervention group had more satisfaction compared to the control one. Statistical test showed a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.003).Conclusion: Generally, it can be said that the immediate and planned fEEDBACKs during the training were offered to students and it could lead the way clinical training in the correct direction. So, the student satisfaction was increased with this process.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AHMADY, S., ZAND, S., NIKRAVAN MOFRAD, M., & RAFIEI, F.. (2015). STUDENT SATISFACTION ON GETTING FEEDBACK IN CLINICAL TEACHING. MEDICAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 10(3), 208-218. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/208236/en

Vancouver: Copy

AHMADY S., ZAND S., NIKRAVAN MOFRAD M., RAFIEI F.. STUDENT SATISFACTION ON GETTING FEEDBACK IN CLINICAL TEACHING. MEDICAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT[Internet]. 2015;10(3):208-218. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/208236/en

IEEE: Copy

S. AHMADY, S. ZAND, M. NIKRAVAN MOFRAD, and F. RAFIEI, “STUDENT SATISFACTION ON GETTING FEEDBACK IN CLINICAL TEACHING,” MEDICAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 208–218, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/208236/en

Related Journal Papers