COMPARING CONDITIONAL STANDARD ERROR OF MEASUREMENT AMONG NON-LINEAR RAW TO SCALE SCORES METHODS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAHANIFAR MOJTABA; KHODAIE EBRAHIM; YOUNESI JALIL; MOUSAVI SEYED AMIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Educational Measurement Year:2017 | Volume:8 | Issue:29 Page(s): 93-120

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,198

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING CONDITIONAL STANDARD ERROR OF MEASUREMENT AMONG NON-LINEAR RAW TO SCALE SCORES METHODS

Author(s)

JAHANIFAR MOJTABA | KHODAIE EBRAHIM | YOUNESI JALIL | MOUSAVI SEYED AMIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SCALE SCORESQ1

NORMALIZINGQ1

ARCSINE TRANSFORMATIONQ1

CONDITIONAL STANDARD ERROR OF MEASUREMENTQ1

Abstract

In order to the better interpreting and comparing scores in test batteries the raw scores in each test are converted to a common scale that called scale score. There are different Linear and nonlinear methods to convert raw scores to SCALE SCORES. Conventional methods of non-linear converting raw scores to SCALE SCORES are normalization and Arcsine methods.In This study that aimed to compare the standard error of measurement in non-linear converting methods we used 10000 random simulated sample data and 10000 random real sample data from Iran university entrance exam applicants.in order to compare converting methods CONDITIONAL STANDARD ERROR OF MEASUREMENT that called CSEM, frequency charts and statistical indexes like moments was used. The results showed that both methods have different features. Although scores in both methods have high reliability and accuracy but Arcsine method reducing score error undulation for different score levels, also the mean of standard error of measurement for Arcsine SCALE SCORES was less than normalized SCALE SCORES.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAHANIFAR, MOJTABA, KHODAIE, EBRAHIM, YOUNESI, JALIL, & MOUSAVI, SEYED AMIN. (2017). COMPARING CONDITIONAL STANDARD ERROR OF MEASUREMENT AMONG NON-LINEAR RAW TO SCALE SCORES METHODS. TRAINING MEASUREMENT, 8(29 ), 93-120. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/214658/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAHANIFAR MOJTABA, KHODAIE EBRAHIM, YOUNESI JALIL, MOUSAVI SEYED AMIN. COMPARING CONDITIONAL STANDARD ERROR OF MEASUREMENT AMONG NON-LINEAR RAW TO SCALE SCORES METHODS. TRAINING MEASUREMENT[Internet]. 2017;8(29 ):93-120. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/214658/en

IEEE: Copy

MOJTABA JAHANIFAR, EBRAHIM KHODAIE, JALIL YOUNESI, and SEYED AMIN MOUSAVI, “COMPARING CONDITIONAL STANDARD ERROR OF MEASUREMENT AMONG NON-LINEAR RAW TO SCALE SCORES METHODS,” TRAINING MEASUREMENT, vol. 8, no. 29 , pp. 93–120, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/214658/en

Related Journal Papers