COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLASSIC LARYNGEAL MASK (LMAC) WITH STREAMLINED LINER PHARYNGEAL AIRWAY (SLIPA) IN GENERAL ANESTHESIA

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NOUROZI AFSANEH; FATEH SHAHIN; TALEBI HOUSHNAG; AKBARI ALIREZA; ROUDBARANI MOLOUK; KOUCHAKI MARYAM; FATEH ARMIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Anesthesiology and Pain Year:2012 | Volume:3 | Issue:1 Page(s): 54-61

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

679

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLASSIC LARYNGEAL MASK (LMAC) WITH STREAMLINED LINER PHARYNGEAL AIRWAY (SLIPA) IN GENERAL ANESTHESIA

Author(s)

Keywords

GENERAL ANESTHESIAQ3

LARYNGEAL MASK CLASSICQ2

SLIPAQ2

Abstract

Aim and Background: Laryngeal mask is an airway control equipment which is replaced by endotracheal tube in GENERAL ANESTHESIA in many surgical procedure. This study compares the efficacy and safety of LMAc and SLIPA.Methods and Materials: This study was a single-blind, randomized clinical trial that was conducted on 320 patients between the age of 15-70, ASA I -II, BMI less than 35, in general surgery, orthopedic surgery, urologic and gynecologic surgery. With the operating time less than an hour. Insertion of LMA and SLIPA, insertion time, determining the gastric air insufflation and the easiness difficulty of removing the mask and the severity of sore throat was recorded.Findings: Insertion was straightforward in 74.38% and slightly difficult in 25.62% for SLIPA cases versus straightforward in 66.87% and slightly difficult in 28.75% and obviously difficult in 4.38% for the LMAc cases. Average insertion time was also significantly shorter in SLIPA than LMAc (34.57 seconds vs. 45.56 seconds). Between two groups in the amount of air entering the stomach and difficulty in removing the device Sore throat with a higher intensity of 5 was more in LMAc than SLIPA but cases without sore throat were higher in LMAc group (20% vs. 13%). Blood contamination of the device after its removal was significantly higher in LMAc group.Conclusions: Suitability of the SLIPA in small and short term surgery has been proved, but its effectiveness in longer surgery requiring mechanical ventilation needs more investigation.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NOUROZI, AFSANEH, FATEH, SHAHIN, TALEBI, HOUSHNAG, AKBARI, ALIREZA, ROUDBARANI, MOLOUK, KOUCHAKI, MARYAM, & FATEH, ARMIN. (2012). COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLASSIC LARYNGEAL MASK (LMAC) WITH STREAMLINED LINER PHARYNGEAL AIRWAY (SLIPA) IN GENERAL ANESTHESIA. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN (PERSIAN), 3(1), 54-61. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/216192/en

Vancouver: Copy

NOUROZI AFSANEH, FATEH SHAHIN, TALEBI HOUSHNAG, AKBARI ALIREZA, ROUDBARANI MOLOUK, KOUCHAKI MARYAM, FATEH ARMIN. COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLASSIC LARYNGEAL MASK (LMAC) WITH STREAMLINED LINER PHARYNGEAL AIRWAY (SLIPA) IN GENERAL ANESTHESIA. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN (PERSIAN)[Internet]. 2012;3(1):54-61. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/216192/en

IEEE: Copy

AFSANEH NOUROZI, SHAHIN FATEH, HOUSHNAG TALEBI, ALIREZA AKBARI, MOLOUK ROUDBARANI, MARYAM KOUCHAKI, and ARMIN FATEH, “COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLASSIC LARYNGEAL MASK (LMAC) WITH STREAMLINED LINER PHARYNGEAL AIRWAY (SLIPA) IN GENERAL ANESTHESIA,” JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN (PERSIAN), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/216192/en

Related Journal Papers