RAZI AND GHAZZALI ON CONCEIT, COMPARATIVELY VIEWED

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FARAMARZ QARAMALEKI AHAD; SALMAN MAHINI SAKINEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Research Quarterly in Islamic Ethics Year:2011 | Volume:4 | Issue:11 Page(s): 39-54

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

932

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

RAZI AND GHAZZALI ON CONCEIT, COMPARATIVELY VIEWED

Author(s)

FARAMARZ QARAMALEKI AHAD | SALMAN MAHINI SAKINEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ETHICSQ2

CONCEITQ3

SELF-LOVEQ3

FAKHR RAZIQ3

GHAZZALIQ3

Abstract

Conceit is discussed as a vice in relative actions of one's own in the most ethical works. When studying CONCEIT, Razi has thought it on a medicine-based view of ETHICS and with a safety-centered approach. GHAZZALI, however, studies CONCEIT with regard to his theological view. In the paper, the two approaches along with their consequences have been intended as the problem. According to the hypothesis of the paper, GHAZZALI has taken a religious basis in conceptualizing the subject. In addition, the origion of CONCEIT, its way of treatment, as well as Razi and GHAZZALI's methodology have been intended as problems of the paper. Razi has known CONCEIT as an imaginary perception of mind when measuring its own conducts. For Ghazzai, yet, it is originated from the ignorance of Divinty aspect of favors. In this way, their ways of prevention and treatment differ.

Cites

No record.

References

THE THEORY OF HEALTHY MAN IN RAZI’S SYSTEM OF ETHICS

Cite

APA: Copy

FARAMARZ QARAMALEKI, AHAD, & SALMAN MAHINI, SAKINEH. (2011). RAZI AND GHAZZALI ON CONCEIT, COMPARATIVELY VIEWED. PAZHUHESH NAME-E AKHLAGH, 4(11), 39-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/217456/en

Vancouver: Copy

FARAMARZ QARAMALEKI AHAD, SALMAN MAHINI SAKINEH. RAZI AND GHAZZALI ON CONCEIT, COMPARATIVELY VIEWED. PAZHUHESH NAME-E AKHLAGH[Internet]. 2011;4(11):39-54. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/217456/en

IEEE: Copy

AHAD FARAMARZ QARAMALEKI, and SAKINEH SALMAN MAHINI, “RAZI AND GHAZZALI ON CONCEIT, COMPARATIVELY VIEWED,” PAZHUHESH NAME-E AKHLAGH, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 39–54, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/217456/en

Related Journal Papers