مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,132
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ASSESSMENT OF LIS JOURNAL’S WEBSITE BASED ON WEBSITE QUALITY EVALUATION TOOLS (WQET) AND PRESENTATION OF OFFERED PATTERN

Pages

  1-12

Abstract

 Purpose: The survey has been conducted to evaluate and to recognize the websites conditions of the internal library and information journals based on the QUALITATIVE EVALUATION (W.Q.A.T.) tool.Methodology: The research is evaluative survey and the evaluation tool is W.Q.A.T. The tool examines the validity of the websites based on the nine general criteria including: content, performance, validity, up-to-date, connection, graphics, scope, and the labels use. The population contained 13 library and information websites which had independent websites. To analyze the data obtained, the percentage, rating mean, and the standard deviation were used.Findings: More than 60% of the websites under study were evaluated from the content quality aspect and more than 80% from the performance score were evaluated as moderate and strong. From the validity score viewpoints, all the websites acted as moderate and more. Only 8% acted strong from the up-to-date aspect and the connection performance had moderate performance. Also, 47% of the websites obtained weak and very weak scores.More than 90% of the websites graphics performance was evaluated as upper moderate and more than 93% of them rated as strong, 46% of super labels were excellent and about 54% were weak.Results: Of the all 31 components and 8 criteria for the evaluation of the library and information journals, only 2 performance and the content criteria had strong score. The graphics, structure, super labels had moderate, the connection and up-to-date criteria had weak performance.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    NOURI AGHKANDI, AZAR, MATLABI, DARYOUSH, & ALIPOUR HAFEZI, MEHDI. (2013). ASSESSMENT OF LIS JOURNAL’S WEBSITE BASED ON WEBSITE QUALITY EVALUATION TOOLS (WQET) AND PRESENTATION OF OFFERED PATTERN. INFORMATION SYSTEMS & SERVICES, 2(3 (7)), 1-12. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/218099/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NOURI AGHKANDI AZAR, MATLABI DARYOUSH, ALIPOUR HAFEZI MEHDI. ASSESSMENT OF LIS JOURNAL’S WEBSITE BASED ON WEBSITE QUALITY EVALUATION TOOLS (WQET) AND PRESENTATION OF OFFERED PATTERN. INFORMATION SYSTEMS & SERVICES[Internet]. 2013;2(3 (7)):1-12. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/218099/en

    IEEE: Copy

    AZAR NOURI AGHKANDI, DARYOUSH MATLABI, and MEHDI ALIPOUR HAFEZI, “ASSESSMENT OF LIS JOURNAL’S WEBSITE BASED ON WEBSITE QUALITY EVALUATION TOOLS (WQET) AND PRESENTATION OF OFFERED PATTERN,” INFORMATION SYSTEMS & SERVICES, vol. 2, no. 3 (7), pp. 1–12, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/218099/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button