COMPARISON OF BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF FOREIGN MTA (PROROOT) AND IRANIAN MTA (ROOT) IN RAT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SADR LAHIJANI M.; ABEDINI R.; KHAKSARI M.; SHOJAEIFAR H.; SHADKAM FAROKHI A.; RAOOF KATEB H.R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Dental School Year:2005 | Volume:23 | Issue:1 Page(s): 80-87

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

814

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF FOREIGN MTA (PROROOT) AND IRANIAN MTA (ROOT) IN RAT

Author(s)

Keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITYQ4

SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTQ4

MINERAL TRIOXIDE AGGREGATE (MTA)Q4

ROOTQ4

PROROOTQ4

Abstract

Purpose: Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is one of the new materials that was introduced for apicectomy at first but today is used for many purposes in endodontics. This study is done due to the importance of economical points in dental materials and decreasing the dental fees and to use new products. The aim of this study was to compare tissue reaction of foreign MTA (proroot) and Iranian MTA (Root) by SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTed tube in rat.Methods & Materials: Fifty four rats were divided into four groups of experiments (40 rat) and 2 groups of control (14 rat). In experimental groups two isolated regions were incised to implant two polyethylene tubes filled with ROOT and PROROOT, and in control groups two empty tubes were implanted. Animals were sacrificed after 7 and 30 days. After histopathologic preparation, H&E staining, samples were evaluated for the thickness of capsule, intensity, type and extention of inflammation and necrosis. The results were analysed by chi-square.Results: There was no statistical difference in the tissue reaction between ROOT and pro ROOT.Conclusion: ROOT is a biocompatible material as PROROOT.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SADR LAHIJANI, M., ABEDINI, R., KHAKSARI, M., SHOJAEIFAR, H., SHADKAM FAROKHI, A., & RAOOF KATEB, H.R.. (2005). COMPARISON OF BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF FOREIGN MTA (PROROOT) AND IRANIAN MTA (ROOT) IN RAT. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 23(1), 80-87. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/21840/en

Vancouver: Copy

SADR LAHIJANI M., ABEDINI R., KHAKSARI M., SHOJAEIFAR H., SHADKAM FAROKHI A., RAOOF KATEB H.R.. COMPARISON OF BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF FOREIGN MTA (PROROOT) AND IRANIAN MTA (ROOT) IN RAT. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2005;23(1):80-87. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/21840/en

IEEE: Copy

M. SADR LAHIJANI, R. ABEDINI, M. KHAKSARI, H. SHOJAEIFAR, A. SHADKAM FAROKHI, and H.R. RAOOF KATEB, “COMPARISON OF BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF FOREIGN MTA (PROROOT) AND IRANIAN MTA (ROOT) IN RAT,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 80–87, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/21840/en

Related Journal Papers