PRIORITIZING BRAND EQUITY METHODS FROM CUSTOMERS’ PERSPECTIVE FOR FINANCE INDUSTRY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

YOUSEFI DARESTANI S.; NAJAFI A.A.; SETAK M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT Year:2015 | Volume:9 | Issue:25 Page(s): 115-132

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,087

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

PRIORITIZING BRAND EQUITY METHODS FROM CUSTOMERS’ PERSPECTIVE FOR FINANCE INDUSTRY

Author(s)

YOUSEFI DARESTANI S. | NAJAFI A.A. | SETAK M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

BRAND EQUITYQ2

BRAND EQUITY ASSESSMENT METHODSQ2

BRAND EQUITY STAKEHOLDERSQ2

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)Q2

Abstract

BRAND EQUITY assessment serves as an important measurement of strategic value for internal use as well as for a number of external stakeholders. While there are a number of methods and models available for BRAND EQUITY assessment, it is still uncertain which approach is best. Yet, almost no research exists that has empirically prioritized the existing BRAND EQUITY methods from the perspective of different stakeholders. In this paper a model is developed for prioritizing BRAND EQUITY methodologies from the viewpoint of customers as a stakeholder of BRAND EQUITY. The criteria of this process are the expectations of customers including quality, reputation, and benefit according to Jones BRAND EQUITY stakeholder model. The priority of these criteria sets via a structured questionnaire filled by customers.Then the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) incorporates to prioritize BRAND EQUITY methodologies versus these criteria. The empirical findings of this study indicate that the more a method evaluates the benefit, the more it is relevant for measuring BRAND EQUITY. Among BRAND EQUITY methods evaluated in this study, Keller’s customer-based BRAND EQUITY model gained the highest weight regarding taking benefit into consideration and was selected as the best method to evaluate brands from the customers’ perspective in finance industry. This study set out to prioritize the brand valuation pool to help practitioners and academics in assessing the alternative techniques and selecting the most relevant one for customers.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

YOUSEFI DARESTANI, S., NAJAFI, A.A., & SETAK, M.. (2015). PRIORITIZING BRAND EQUITY METHODS FROM CUSTOMERS’ PERSPECTIVE FOR FINANCE INDUSTRY. JOURNAL OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 9(25), 115-132. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/218855/en

Vancouver: Copy

YOUSEFI DARESTANI S., NAJAFI A.A., SETAK M.. PRIORITIZING BRAND EQUITY METHODS FROM CUSTOMERS’ PERSPECTIVE FOR FINANCE INDUSTRY. JOURNAL OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2015;9(25):115-132. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/218855/en

IEEE: Copy

S. YOUSEFI DARESTANI, A.A. NAJAFI, and M. SETAK, “PRIORITIZING BRAND EQUITY METHODS FROM CUSTOMERS’ PERSPECTIVE FOR FINANCE INDUSTRY,” JOURNAL OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT, vol. 9, no. 25, pp. 115–132, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/218855/en

Related Journal Papers