A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CRITERIA OF THE COMPETENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE IN IRAN AND FRANCE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

VAEZI SEYED MOJTABA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Comparative Law Year:2013 | Volume:9 (19) | Issue:1 (97) Page(s): 25-46

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,425

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CRITERIA OF THE COMPETENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE IN IRAN AND FRANCE

Author(s)

VAEZI SEYED MOJTABA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ORDINARY JUDGEQ2

ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGEQ2

COMPETENCEQ2

ADMINISTRATIVE WRONGQ2

COURT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICEQ1

Abstract

In systems of judicial duality and all legal systems that are experiencing a special judge for the administrative cases, the issue of e determining the scope of jurisdiction is always important. This question is not only dependent on the will of the legislator but the judge must also seek the appropriate criteria considering the foundations and requirements of his/her legal system.In this article, by offering a new classification of criteria for the COMPETENCE of administrative courts in several countries, and by a critical study, we show that the Iranian ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE may adopt which criteria by which reasons.We present two types of criteria: judicial criteria and administrative criteria. Administrative criteria are related to method, aim, or ADMINISTRATIVE WRONG and the quality of the relationship between government and citizen. Judicial criteria are considered to consist of the nature of remedy sought, nature of the judicial proceedings and personality of the parties.In France interests of justice rather than administrative criteria are adopted while in Iran jurisdictional criteria are followed. In our opinion, the Iranian judge must not overuse a single type criterion.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

VAEZI, SEYED MOJTABA. (2013). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CRITERIA OF THE COMPETENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE IN IRAN AND FRANCE. COMPARATIVE LAW (NAMEH-YE MOFID), 9 (19)(1 (97)), 25-46. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/219116/en

Vancouver: Copy

VAEZI SEYED MOJTABA. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CRITERIA OF THE COMPETENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE IN IRAN AND FRANCE. COMPARATIVE LAW (NAMEH-YE MOFID)[Internet]. 2013;9 (19)(1 (97)):25-46. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/219116/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYED MOJTABA VAEZI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CRITERIA OF THE COMPETENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE IN IRAN AND FRANCE,” COMPARATIVE LAW (NAMEH-YE MOFID), vol. 9 (19), no. 1 (97), pp. 25–46, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/219116/en

Related Journal Papers