مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,555
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

6

Information Journal Paper

Title

ANALYSIS OF RANKING METHODOLOGIES IN DEVELOPMENT MEASURING: A CASE STUDY OF KHUZESTAN PROVINCE COUNTIES

Pages

  65-93

Abstract

 Today, the knowledge of regions’ strong and weak points and the existing gaps between regions is necessary for better planning and programming to deal with them. Using such indexes as economic, sociologic, cultural, sanitary and other indexes which can be good criteria for the position and place determination of these quotients, is the main solving problem factor to achieve economic welfare, sociologic health in assessing stable development. That is the more careful this process is the more effectiveness is expected.Thus in this study three methods of NUMERICAL TAXONOMY, FACTOR ANALYSIS and FUZZY LOGIC have been used for the identification of Khuzestan province counties development ranking in 1379 and in 1386. Besides this ranking, comparative analysis of these methods has been done.Results show that the development opportunities of many counties in this province in 1386 compared to 1379 have been destroyed. Results also indicate that condense variability in NUMERICAL TAXONOMY is less than the two other methods. In fact, this method stands between the two methods in the ranking. Perhaps the difference in multiplier is due to standardization which can omit many clustering aspects of criteria. Indeed, it seems that FUZZY LOGIC ranking is more reliable.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

NASROLLAHI, KHADIJEH, AKBARI, NEMATOLAHE, & HIDARI, MASOUD. (2011). ANALYSIS OF RANKING METHODOLOGIES IN DEVELOPMENT MEASURING: A CASE STUDY OF KHUZESTAN PROVINCE COUNTIES. TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, 3(4), 65-93. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/219613/en

Vancouver: Copy

NASROLLAHI KHADIJEH, AKBARI NEMATOLAHE, HIDARI MASOUD. ANALYSIS OF RANKING METHODOLOGIES IN DEVELOPMENT MEASURING: A CASE STUDY OF KHUZESTAN PROVINCE COUNTIES. TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING[Internet]. 2011;3(4):65-93. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/219613/en

IEEE: Copy

KHADIJEH NASROLLAHI, NEMATOLAHE AKBARI, and MASOUD HIDARI, “ANALYSIS OF RANKING METHODOLOGIES IN DEVELOPMENT MEASURING: A CASE STUDY OF KHUZESTAN PROVINCE COUNTIES,” TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 65–93, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/219613/en

Related Journal Papers

Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button