CORNEA under magnifier: an assessment of usability of CORNEA against William Rowe’ s evidential argument from gratuitous evil

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

mirbagheri mohammad ali; YAZDANI ABBAS; ALIZAMANI AMIR ABASS

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM) Year:2019 | Volume:9 | Issue:2 Page(s): 107-129

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

317

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CORNEA under magnifier: an assessment of usability of CORNEA against William Rowe’ s evidential argument from gratuitous evil

Author(s)

mirbagheri mohammad ali | YAZDANI ABBAS | ALIZAMANI AMIR ABASS | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

William RoweQ2

Stephen WykstraQ1

problem of evilQ1

gratuitous evilQ1

CORNEAQ1

skeptical theismQ1

Islamic thinkersQ2

Abstract

By introducing evidential argument, William Rowe opened a new chapter in discussions about problem of evil. Rowe’ s first formulation of the problem based on the idea that because “ it appears” that some evils in the world are gratuitous then they are indeed so. The most influential critique of Rowe’ s argument is Stephen Wykstra’ sthat is based on the epistemological principle which is called CORNEA. He shows that in the Rowe’ s assumed situation we are not permitted to pass from “ it appears” to “ is” . According to CORNEA, considering evidence Xwe areentitled to say it appears that p, only if p were not the case, probably X was different in a discernable way. The goal of this paper is firstly to introduce CORNEA as an answer to the problem of gratuitous evil, then introduce and assesse some selected critiques ofCORNEA and to defencethe principle and finally compare between skeptical theism-that CORNEA is an instance of – and approaches of Islamic thinkers to the problem of evil.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

mirbagheri, mohammad ali, YAZDANI, ABBAS, & ALIZAMANI, AMIR ABASS. (2019). CORNEA under magnifier: an assessment of usability of CORNEA against William Rowe’ s evidential argument from gratuitous evil. HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM), 9(2 ), 107-129. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/220703/en

Vancouver: Copy

mirbagheri mohammad ali, YAZDANI ABBAS, ALIZAMANI AMIR ABASS. CORNEA under magnifier: an assessment of usability of CORNEA against William Rowe’ s evidential argument from gratuitous evil. HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM)[Internet]. 2019;9(2 ):107-129. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/220703/en

IEEE: Copy

mohammad ali mirbagheri, ABBAS YAZDANI, and AMIR ABASS ALIZAMANI, “CORNEA under magnifier: an assessment of usability of CORNEA against William Rowe’ s evidential argument from gratuitous evil,” HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM), vol. 9, no. 2 , pp. 107–129, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/220703/en

Related Journal Papers