THE PROOF FROM CONTINGENCY AND NECESSITY AND KANTS AND HUMES CRITICISMS OF THAT KANTS AND HUMES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

PARSANIA HAMID

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM) Year:2010 | Volume:1 | Issue:1 (1) Page(s): 1-18

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

4,565

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE PROOF FROM CONTINGENCY AND NECESSITY AND KANTS AND HUMES CRITICISMS OF THAT KANTS AND HUMES

Author(s)

PARSANIA HAMID | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

POSSIBLE CONTINGENCYQ3

PRIMARY AND ESSENTIAL PREDICATIONQ2

ESSENTIAL CONTINGENCYQ3

PROOF FROM CONTINGENCY AND NECESSITYQ2

COMMON TECHNICAL PREDICATIONQ2

Abstract

The Siddiqin proof as presented by Avicenna for the first time to express the PROOF FROM CONTINGENCY AND NECESSITY, entred into the works of Thomas Acquinas through Arerroes and Maimonides in the middle ages. The concept related to this proof was not conveyed in the works of the above-mentioned authors and this led to a kind of ambiguity in that proof in philosophy after the western Renaissance. This article deals with the PROOF FROM CONTINGENCY AND NECESSITY as reflected in western philosophy since the 17th century. The present article claims that Leibniz and Wolff appealed to this proof on the basis of POSSIBLE CONTINGENCY rather than ESSENTIAL CONTINGENCY and also the criticisms aimed at its Thomistic account by Hume and Kant is not devoid of some strength and validity. In the final part of the article, the validity and strength of Avicennan account of the proof are cited and emphasized, so as to reject the criticisms aimed at it since the 17th century onward.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

PARSANIA, HAMID. (2010). THE PROOF FROM CONTINGENCY AND NECESSITY AND KANTS AND HUMES CRITICISMS OF THAT KANTS AND HUMES. HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM), 1(1 (1)), 1-18. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/220719/en

Vancouver: Copy

PARSANIA HAMID. THE PROOF FROM CONTINGENCY AND NECESSITY AND KANTS AND HUMES CRITICISMS OF THAT KANTS AND HUMES. HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM)[Internet]. 2010;1(1 (1)):1-18. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/220719/en

IEEE: Copy

HAMID PARSANIA, “THE PROOF FROM CONTINGENCY AND NECESSITY AND KANTS AND HUMES CRITICISMS OF THAT KANTS AND HUMES,” HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM), vol. 1, no. 1 (1), pp. 1–18, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/220719/en

Related Journal Papers