COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CELECOXIB (A COX-2 INNHIBITOR) VERUS IBUPROFEN IN CONTROL OF PAIN DUE TO ACUTE APICAL PERIODONTITIS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHESHLAGHI AZAR N.; KHERADMAND R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Dental School Year:2006 | Volume:24 | Issue:2 (69) Page(s): 363-368

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,040

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CELECOXIB (A COX-2 INNHIBITOR) VERUS IBUPROFEN IN CONTROL OF PAIN DUE TO ACUTE APICAL PERIODONTITIS

Author(s)

GHESHLAGHI AZAR N. | KHERADMAND R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NSAIDSQ3

IBUPROFENQ3

CELECOXIBQ3

Abstract

Background &Aim: This double - blind clinical study compared the pain reducing effect of CELECOXIB and IBUPROFEN in patients with severe endodontically originated pain.Methods &Materials: A total of 30 patients presenting with severe pulpally originated pain consented to a single - dose oral administration of 100 mg of CELECOXIB or 400 mg of IBUPROFEN.Patients - reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ratings of pain intensity were recorded at every 15 min for 90 min after drug administration. Data were analyzed using student's t test.Results: Results indicated that at the 15, 30, 45, 60 and 75 min periods, both CELECOXIB and IBUPROFEN provided pain relief, but there was no significant difference between them. At 90 min period, CELECOXIB showed significantly better pain relief than IBUPROFEN (P<0.01).Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, it seems that CELECOXIB has better pain reducing effect than IBUPROFEN.

Cites

HISTOPATHOLOGIC STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF CELECOXIB TO CONTROL ACUTE PERIAPICAL INFLAMMATION AFTER ROOT CANAL TREATMENT IN CATS

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHESHLAGHI AZAR, N., & KHERADMAND, R.. (2006). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CELECOXIB (A COX-2 INNHIBITOR) VERUS IBUPROFEN IN CONTROL OF PAIN DUE TO ACUTE APICAL PERIODONTITIS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 24(2 (69)), 363-368. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/22088/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHESHLAGHI AZAR N., KHERADMAND R.. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CELECOXIB (A COX-2 INNHIBITOR) VERUS IBUPROFEN IN CONTROL OF PAIN DUE TO ACUTE APICAL PERIODONTITIS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2006;24(2 (69)):363-368. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/22088/en

IEEE: Copy

N. GHESHLAGHI AZAR, and R. KHERADMAND, “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CELECOXIB (A COX-2 INNHIBITOR) VERUS IBUPROFEN IN CONTROL OF PAIN DUE TO ACUTE APICAL PERIODONTITIS,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, vol. 24, no. 2 (69), pp. 363–368, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/22088/en

Related Journal Papers