CRITICAL ANALYZING OF KHWARAZM VICTORY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HASSANZADEH E.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL STUDIES OF ISLAM Year:2011 | Volume:3 | Issue:8 Page(s): 9-32

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

632

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRITICAL ANALYZING OF KHWARAZM VICTORY

Author(s)

HASSANZADEH E. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CRITICAL ANALYZING OF NARRATIONQ2

KHWARAZMQ3

BALADHURIQ2

TABARIQ2

IBN AASAM KUFIQ3

BIRUNIQ2

QUTAYBAQ3

Abstract

Commercial position, plentiful wealth and higher geographical situation of KHWARAZM, caused Muslim victors pay attention to KHWARAZM from the first years they invaded it.The arab’six attacks to Khwaraazm have been narrated sporadically and differently in historical references. There are very incomplete data on the first three attacks which cannot be reviewed due to their limited and similar narrations. There are several conflicting data only from the last three attacks. One attack was done by Yazid ibn al-Muhallab and two others by QUTAYBA ibn Muslim. They are narrated with different origins in four different references: BALADHURI, TABARI, Ibn Aasam and BIRUNI. BIRUNI’s narration is different and conflicted with the others, because of its origin. Despite the volume of data in three other historians’ narrations, they are in an advocacy manner of Arab’s attacks, because of the similar origins. In this article, we are going to analyze critically the narrations of KHWARAZM victory by criticizing the narrative.On the basis of performed studies, it seems that the first three historians couldn’t present a fair story of the two opposite sides of conflict, because of their similar origin although they demonstrated different information. They get advocacy position in order to legitimize the QUTAYBA attack. They have confused two QUTAYBA attacks and submit one narration which is discontinuous in structure and incoherent in content because of using several different narrations.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HASSANZADEH, E.. (2011). CRITICAL ANALYZING OF KHWARAZM VICTORY. JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL STUDIES OF ISLAM, 3(8), 9-32. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/221328/en

Vancouver: Copy

HASSANZADEH E.. CRITICAL ANALYZING OF KHWARAZM VICTORY. JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL STUDIES OF ISLAM[Internet]. 2011;3(8):9-32. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/221328/en

IEEE: Copy

E. HASSANZADEH, “CRITICAL ANALYZING OF KHWARAZM VICTORY,” JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL STUDIES OF ISLAM, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 9–32, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/221328/en

Related Journal Papers