Changes of Ground of Reasonableness in USA Judicial Review

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

shojaeian khadijeh

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL) Year:2019 | Volume:20 | Issue:61 Page(s): 235-259

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

327

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Changes of Ground of Reasonableness in USA Judicial Review

Author(s)

shojaeian khadijeh | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

reasonablenessQ1

rule makingQ1

hard look reviewQ1

arbitrary actsQ1

arbitrary and capricious reviewQ1

Abstract

reasonableness is one aspect of judicial review in the common law system. Its origin was in England, however it has been introduced and applied in other countries with some modifications. This criterion is used in the US legal system as one way of violating the informal rules of administrative agencies under the heading of “ arbitrary and capricious review” which is expressed in article 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The present article, in light of case laws, describes and analyzes developments in the application of the above criteria in the courts of the United States. Over the time, interpretations of courts have been changed and their deferential interpretations have moved to hard look ground. Hard look ground seems to call for more judicial scrutiny and more heightened standards of judicial review than had been traditionally demanded from the arbitrary and capricious test. In hard-look doctrine, courts should carefully review administrative agencies decisions to ensure that the agencies have genuinely engaged in reasoned decision making. The hard look doctrine is simply a reflection of the courts view of how an effective and meaningful process of judicial review should be conducted. Accordingly, the administrative agencies should examine all the important dimensions of the matter and the alternative solutions and, by referring to the documentation, provide detailed justifications of their new decisions and changes to their previous procedures.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

shojaeian, khadijeh. (2019). Changes of Ground of Reasonableness in USA Judicial Review. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL), 20(61 ), 235-259. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/225203/en

Vancouver: Copy

shojaeian khadijeh. Changes of Ground of Reasonableness in USA Judicial Review. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL)[Internet]. 2019;20(61 ):235-259. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/225203/en

IEEE: Copy

khadijeh shojaeian, “Changes of Ground of Reasonableness in USA Judicial Review,” JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL), vol. 20, no. 61 , pp. 235–259, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/225203/en

Related Journal Papers