مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

620
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVOLUTION IN THE INTERNAL JUSTICE REGIME OF THE UNITED NATIONS

Pages

  167-193

Abstract

 Managers and Decision-Makers of All Organizations should understand that they will be Responsible for their decisions. Internal Tribunals of the UNITED NATIONS are statutory institutions created by the UN General Assembly in response to the need for an independent, transparent, effective, efficient judicial system that would ensure managerial accountability. By these Tribunals, the EMPLOYEES are sure that they can object to unfair and wrong decisions, and demand their rights that are foreseen for them under the rules and statute of the organization. The internal justice regime of the UNITED NATIONS has changed a lot up to now. The first ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL of the UN was created in 1949, and it looked after the disputes between EMPLOYEES and the organization until the beginning of 21st century. Naturally in these long years its weaknesses were found and tries were made to fix them. Eventually in 2007, the foundation of the new internal justice regime of the UN that was composed of two Tribunals named UNITED NATIONS DISPUTE TRIBUNAL and UNITED NATIONS Appeals Tribunal was made. Analysis of Weaknesses and strength of the first and the old internal justice regime, and their comparison is this paper's goal.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HADADI, MEHDI, & HEKMATIMOGHADDAM, SEYEDMOHSEN. (2017). EVOLUTION IN THE INTERNAL JUSTICE REGIME OF THE UNITED NATIONS. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL), 19(55 ), 167-193. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/225281/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HADADI MEHDI, HEKMATIMOGHADDAM SEYEDMOHSEN. EVOLUTION IN THE INTERNAL JUSTICE REGIME OF THE UNITED NATIONS. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL)[Internet]. 2017;19(55 ):167-193. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/225281/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MEHDI HADADI, and SEYEDMOHSEN HEKMATIMOGHADDAM, “EVOLUTION IN THE INTERNAL JUSTICE REGIME OF THE UNITED NATIONS,” JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL), vol. 19, no. 55 , pp. 167–193, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/225281/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top