A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF “PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE” IN OPINIONS AND DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONALS TRIBUNALS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAMAZANI GHAVAMABADI MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL) Year:2013 | Volume:15 | Issue:40 Page(s): 141-164

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

992

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF “PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE” IN OPINIONS AND DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONALS TRIBUNALS

Author(s)

RAMAZANI GHAVAMABADI MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLEQ1

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICEQ2

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEAQ2

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATIONQ2

ENVIRONMENTQ1

Abstract

PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE is one of the pivotal principles in the realm of International ENVIRONMENTal law.For insuring sufficient protection of the ENVIRONMENT, the Precautionary Approach requires states to take comprehensive precautionary measures in line with their affordable capabilities. Lack of ready access to definitive scientific facts and figures, where there are threats of serious or irreversible damages, certainty may not lay the foundation for evading effective measures be taken as to safeguard ENVIRONMENTal against degradation. Although many international ENVIRONMENTal instruments have made reference to the principle, it is notwell respected and adequately adhered to by international tribunals. This paper seeks to examine the legal validity of this principle before such tribunals.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAMAZANI GHAVAMABADI, MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN. (2013). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF “PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE” IN OPINIONS AND DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONALS TRIBUNALS. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL), 15(40), 141-164. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/225336/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAMAZANI GHAVAMABADI MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF “PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE” IN OPINIONS AND DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONALS TRIBUNALS. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL)[Internet]. 2013;15(40):141-164. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/225336/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN RAMAZANI GHAVAMABADI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF “PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE” IN OPINIONS AND DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONALS TRIBUNALS,” JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL), vol. 15, no. 40, pp. 141–164, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/225336/en

Related Journal Papers