MULLASADRA AND TABATABAEI’S DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS ON “QUIDDITY” AND ITS EFFECT ON THE EVIDENCE OF “PRINCIPALITY OF BEING THEORY”

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ASADI SIAVASH; AKBARIAN REZA; SAEEDIMEHR MOHAMMAD; NABAVI LOTFOLLAH

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal Ontological Researches Year:2016 | Volume:4 | Issue:8 Page(s): 1-17

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,619

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MULLASADRA AND TABATABAEI’S DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS ON “QUIDDITY” AND ITS EFFECT ON THE EVIDENCE OF “PRINCIPALITY OF BEING THEORY”

Author(s)

ASADI SIAVASH | AKBARIAN REZA | SAEEDIMEHR MOHAMMAD | NABAVI LOTFOLLAH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

BEINGQ2

QUIDDITYQ2

PRINCIPALITYQ2

SUBJECTIVE CONSIDERATIONQ2

MULLA SADRAQ2

TABATABAEIQ2

Abstract

This paper intends to find an answer to the problematic description of “quiddity” in MullaSadra and TABATABAEI’s philosophy and to consider its effect on evidence of “Principality of Existence Theory”. There are two interpretations of QUIDDITY in MullaSadra’s philosophy, but actual realization of existence (by itself) and QUIDDITY (by accident) which has more consistency to MullaSadra’s philosophical structure. In TABATABAEI’s philosophy, however, “reality” is “existence” and QUIDDITY (as known) has no actual realization. QUIDDITY is apparition of essential negations and limitations of existence in the mind, therefore concrete equivalent of QUIDDITY is such negations which are considered as the arbitrary and non-existence related to something. Moreover, by the both interpretations on QUIDDITY, PRINCIPALITY of Existence will be regarded as a self-evident theory and the arguments will be for indicating. But TABATABAEI’s view is more qualified and in his philosophy “existence is principal” is an analytical proposition.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

ASADI, SIAVASH, AKBARIAN, REZA, SAEEDIMEHR, MOHAMMAD, & NABAVI, LOTFOLLAH. (2016). MULLASADRA AND TABATABAEI’S DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS ON “QUIDDITY” AND ITS EFFECT ON THE EVIDENCE OF “PRINCIPALITY OF BEING THEORY”. JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES, 4(8), 1-17. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/226086/en

Vancouver: Copy

ASADI SIAVASH, AKBARIAN REZA, SAEEDIMEHR MOHAMMAD, NABAVI LOTFOLLAH. MULLASADRA AND TABATABAEI’S DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS ON “QUIDDITY” AND ITS EFFECT ON THE EVIDENCE OF “PRINCIPALITY OF BEING THEORY”. JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES[Internet]. 2016;4(8):1-17. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/226086/en

IEEE: Copy

SIAVASH ASADI, REZA AKBARIAN, MOHAMMAD SAEEDIMEHR, and LOTFOLLAH NABAVI, “MULLASADRA AND TABATABAEI’S DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS ON “QUIDDITY” AND ITS EFFECT ON THE EVIDENCE OF “PRINCIPALITY OF BEING THEORY”,” JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 1–17, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/226086/en

Related Journal Papers