Critic of consistency of being fundamentality by regarding the concept of being as a secondary intelligible

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAFARIAN MORTEZA; FARAMARZ GHARAMALEKI AHAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal Ontological Researches Year:2019 | Volume:7 | Issue:14 Page(s): 1-18

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

607

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Critic of consistency of being fundamentality by regarding the concept of being as a secondary intelligible

Author(s)

JAFARIAN MORTEZA | FARAMARZ GHARAMALEKI AHAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

fundamentality of beingQ2

Primacy of quiddityQ2

first and secondary intelligibleQ1

concept of beingQ2

significationQ2

Abstract

concept of being, by most of MullaSadra’ s predecessors, considered simply to be as a derivative and secondary intelligible, to which could not be ascribed any concrete objects or properties, as the referents. The specific problem that we want to address is that if one accepts fundamentality of existence, then how the concept of existence would relate to being (wujū d) itself. In fact, there is an affinity between primacy of being and the way in which concept of being signify things in real world, namely the criterion of subsuming it under first or second intelligible classes. We will argue that rendering the concept of being as a secondary intelligible is inconsistent with MullaSadra’ s account of being, based on two different definitions presented traditionally for first and secondary intentions, and the concept, in the sense which characterized by MullaSadra should be subsumed as first intelligible. By exploring the elements of fundamentality of being, one admits that Primacy of being results in the fact that concept of being belongs to first intelligible class.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAFARIAN, MORTEZA, & FARAMARZ GHARAMALEKI, AHAD. (2019). Critic of consistency of being fundamentality by regarding the concept of being as a secondary intelligible. JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES, 7(14 ), 1-18. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/226095/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAFARIAN MORTEZA, FARAMARZ GHARAMALEKI AHAD. Critic of consistency of being fundamentality by regarding the concept of being as a secondary intelligible. JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES[Internet]. 2019;7(14 ):1-18. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/226095/en

IEEE: Copy

MORTEZA JAFARIAN, and AHAD FARAMARZ GHARAMALEKI, “Critic of consistency of being fundamentality by regarding the concept of being as a secondary intelligible,” JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES, vol. 7, no. 14 , pp. 1–18, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/226095/en

Related Journal Papers