ANALYSIS THE ENCOUNTER OF THOMISTIC THEOLOGY OF GILSON AND MARION WITH HEIDEGGERIAN ONTOLOGY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SANAEE ALI

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal Ontological Researches Year:2017 | Volume:5 | Issue:10 Page(s): 51-70

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

587

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ANALYSIS THE ENCOUNTER OF THOMISTIC THEOLOGY OF GILSON AND MARION WITH HEIDEGGERIAN ONTOLOGY

Author(s)

SANAEE ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

GILSONQ2

MARIONQ1

HEIDEGGERQ2

AQUINASQ1

THOMISTIC THEOLOGYQ1

Abstract

In this article, we analyze the approach of GILSON and MARION relation to HEIDEGGER. In next step, we try to highlight the various aspects of HEIDEGGER’s thought that is regarded by GILSON and MARION and also compare this two Neo-Thomistic thinkers’ views. MARION as a contemporary Neo-Thomist is influenced by GILSON. One nexus point of this two Neo-Thomistic thinkers is that they present some part of their view in contrast to HEIDEGGERian ontology. Although they have critical encounter with HEIDEGGER but in some aspects are influenced by him. Following of HEIDEGGER, MARION advertise the slogan of the end of metaphysics but unlike HEIDEGGER believes that AQUINAS is not Onto-Theologist. But GILSON believes that the exit way of the difficulties of modernity is the metaphysics that its offspring and end is the pure act of being, so the ontology of AQUINAS is most authentic metaphysics. In following of GILSON. MARION suggests that substantive approach of Descartes and Duns Scotus to Being lead to nihilistic attitude in contemporary era and for troubleshooting must notice to apophatic implications that is included in Analogy of AQUINAS, in order that the traditional theology void of any metaphysical concepts will be provided.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SANAEE, ALI. (2017). ANALYSIS THE ENCOUNTER OF THOMISTIC THEOLOGY OF GILSON AND MARION WITH HEIDEGGERIAN ONTOLOGY. JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES, 5(10), 51-70. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/226105/en

Vancouver: Copy

SANAEE ALI. ANALYSIS THE ENCOUNTER OF THOMISTIC THEOLOGY OF GILSON AND MARION WITH HEIDEGGERIAN ONTOLOGY. JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES[Internet]. 2017;5(10):51-70. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/226105/en

IEEE: Copy

ALI SANAEE, “ANALYSIS THE ENCOUNTER OF THOMISTIC THEOLOGY OF GILSON AND MARION WITH HEIDEGGERIAN ONTOLOGY,” JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 51–70, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/226105/en

Related Journal Papers